Abstract:With the plethora of machine learning (ML) analyses published in the orthopaedic literature within the last 5 years, several attempts have been made to enhance our understanding of what exactly ML means and how it is used. At its most fundamental level, ML comprises a branch of artificial intelligence that uses algorithms to analyze and learn from patterns in data without explicit programming or human intervention. On the other hand, traditional statistics require a user to specifically choose variables of interest to create a model capable of predicting an outcome, the output of which (1) may be falsely influenced by the variables chosen to be included by the user and (2) does not allow for optimization of performance. Early publications have served as succinct editorials or reviews intended to ease audiences unfamiliar with ML into the complexities that accompany the subject. Most commonly, the focus of these studies concerns the terminology and concepts surrounding ML because it is important to understand the rationale behind performing such studies. Unfortunately, these publications only touch on the most basic aspects of ML and are too frequently repetitive. Indeed, the conclusion of these articles reiterate that the potential clinical utility of these algorithms remains tangential at best in their current form and caution against premature adoption without external validation. By doing so, our perspective and ability to draw our own conclusions from these studies have not advanced, and we are left concluding with each subsequent study that a new algorithm is published for an outcome of interest that cannot be used until further validation. What readers now need is to regress to embrace the principles of the scientific method that they have used to critically assess vast numbers of publications before this wave of newly applied statistical methodology-a guide to interpret results such that their own conclusions can be drawn. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.

Statistics decrypted—a comprehensive review and smartphone-assisted five-step approach for good statistical practice

Common Statistical Errors in Scientific Investigations: A Simple Guide to Avoid Unfounded Decisions

An introduction to descriptive statistics: A review and practical guide

Statistics for the European Respiratory Journal

Semantic and Cognitive Tools to Aid Statistical Science: Replace Confidence and Significance by Compatibility and Surprise

Statistical method use in public health research

Univariate Description and Bivariate Statistical Inference: the First Step Delving into Data

Rolling the DICE (Design, Interpret, Compute, Estimate): Interactive Learning of Biostatistics With Simulations

A Guide for the Application of Statistics in Biomedical Studies Concerning Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence

Saving lives with statistics

Ten Points for High-Quality Statistical Reporting and Data Presentation

Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods

Common mistakes in biostatistics

An observational analysis of the trope “A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant” and other cut-and-paste statistical methods

Principles of Biostatistics

Common Statistical Methods for Clinical Research with SAS Examples, Second Edition

Statistics for Machine Learning with Mathematica Applications

The basic statistical concepts and their interrelationships in diagnostic research

StatXFinder: a web-based self-directed tool that provides appropriate statistical test selection for biomedical researchers in their scientific studies

An Overview of Statistical Data Analysis

Guided Statistical Workflows with Interactive Explanations and Assumption Checking