Recommendations to medical journals on ways to encourage statistical experts to review submissions
Michal Ordak
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2022.2096335
2022-07-12
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Abstract:In recent years, there has been a decline in the quality of statistical analyses conducted on various fields of medicine in the submitted articles 1 . According to Zapf et al., biostatisticians take part in the preparation of appropriate and effective study designs and monitor their course. They are responsible for planning, conducting data analysis, and interpreting and publishing the results 2 . The latest published results show that only 39% of the 2600 accepted articles on various aspects of COVID-19 are statistically correct, which unfortunately may jeopardize the credibility of biomedical research 3 . A 1998 study by Goodman et al. found that 33% of 114 biomedical journals surveyed used a statistical review for all original articles, and 46% used a statistical review at the editor's discretion 4 . Unfortunately, no significant changes took place over the next 20 years. In an article from 2020, published in PLOS ONE, the authors stated that only 34% (36/107) of journal editors rarely or never use a specialized statistical review. Furthermore, 55% of the surveyed respondents said they paid for a statistical reviewer 5 , however, according to Goodman and colleagues, it was about one-third, which is much less 4 . The conducted research is limited in terms of the sparse number of respondents. Due to the low number of statistical reviewers, rewarding this group of people is often necessary. However, these types of people are employed primarily by more prestigious magazines that have the financial resources for this specific purpose. For this reason, it seems advisable to publish recommendations for medical journals regarding ways to find and encourage statistical reviewers to conduct an expert review of the submitted manuscript regarding the performed statistical analysis. Otherwise, there is a high probability that the situation will not change in the near future.
medicine, general & internal, research & experimental