Abstract:Adaptively managing marine protected areas (MPAs) requires accurately assessing whether established MPAs are achieving their goals of protecting and conserving biomass, especially for harvested populations. Ecological MPA assessments commonly compare inside of the MPA to a reference point outside of and/or before implementation (i.e., calculating "response ratios"). Yet, MPAs are not simple ecological experiments; by design, protected populations interact with those outside, and population dynamic responses can be nonlinear. This complicates assessment interpretations. Here, we used a two‐patch population model to explore how MPA response ratios (outside–inside, before–after, and before–after‐control‐impact [BACI]) for fished populations behave under different conditions, like whether the population is receiving a sustainable larval supply or if it is declining despite protection from harvest. We then conducted a Bayesian evaluation of MPA effects on fish and invertebrate populations based on data collected from 82 published studies on 264 no‐take MPAs worldwide, using the results of an earlier global meta‐analysis as priors. We considered the effects of calculating different summary metrics on these results, drawing on the theoretical insights from our population model as a comparative framework. We demonstrate that not all response ratio comparison types provide the same information: For example, outside–inside and BACI comparisons can fail to detect population decline within MPAs, whereas before–after comparisons likely detect that pattern. Considering these limitations, we nonetheless found that MPAs globally are producing positive outcomes, with on average greater biomass, density, and organism size within their boundaries than reference sites. However, only a small portion of studies (18 of 82) provided the temporal data necessary to determine that protection, on average, has led to increased abundance of populations within MPAs over time. These findings demonstrate the importance of considering the underlying system dynamics when assessing MPA effects. Assuming that large outside–inside or BACI response ratios always reflect large and net positive conservation effects may lead to misleading conclusions, we recommend that: (1) when assessing specific MPA effects, empirical findings be considered alongside theoretical knowledge relevant to that MPA system, and (2) management should respond to the local conditions and outcomes, rather than a blanket expectation for positive MPA effects.

Local Expectations for Future Marine Protected Area Performance: A Case Study of the Proposed National Marine Conservation Area in the Southern Strait of Georgia, Canada

Monitoring data for a new large offshore marine protected area reveals infeasible management objectives

From regional effectiveness evaluation and community engagement toward effective marine protected areas

Impact of a local, coastal community based management regime when defining marine protected areas: Empirical results from a study in Okinawa, Japan

Cetacean integration measures in MPA management plans in America

Understanding organism-habitat relationships and critically evaluating reference areas is key to marine protected area assessment

Evaluating the design of the first marine protected area network in Pacific Canada under a changing climate

Assessing stakeholder perceptions to guide social and ecological fit of marine protected areas

Community Change within a Caribbean Coral Reef Marine Protected Area following Two Decades of Local Management

Ecological success of no‐take marine protected areas: Using population dynamics theory to inform a global meta‐analysis

What’s the catch? Profiling the benefits and costs associated with marine protected areas and displaced fishing in the Scotia Sea

International experience of marine protected area management and its implications for China

Decision analysis for designing marine protected areas for multiple species with uncertain fishery status

Running to stand still: The application of substandard OECMs in national and provincial policy in Canada

The MPA Guide: A framework to achieve global goals for the ocean

The role of science in supporting marine protected area network planning and design in California

Importance–Performance Analysis of the Sustainability of South Penghu Marine National Park, Taiwan

The Marine Spatial Planning Index: a tool to guide and assess marine spatial planning

The no-take zone network of the Mexican Caribbean: assessing design and management for the protection of coral reef fish communities

Conserving ecosystem integrity: Ecological theory as a guide for marine protected area monitoring

Why local people do not support conservation: Community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand