Abstract:Statement of problem: Precise assessment of the condylar guidance angle can aid successful prosthodontic treatment. However, the reliability and accuracy of current methods remain unclear. Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of current methods of determining the sagittal condylar guidance angle, including protrusive interocclusal records, axiography, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and panoramic and cephalometric radiographs. Material and methods: A literature search was conducted using BASE, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases up to June 2022. Inclusion criteria involved studies that compared protrusive interocclusal records against other methods of sagittal condylar guidance angle assessment in adult dentate and edentulous patients. Studies that did not provide the values for the right and left joint separately were excluded. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Data were tabulated and analyzed for correlations and their significance. Results: A total of 24 articles qualified for the analysis. The differences between protrusive interocclusal records and panoramic radiograph sagittal condylar guidance angle values were up to 9 degrees. Lateral cephalometric radiographs revealed greater condylar guidance values than facebow transfers or the Bonwill methods. Correlations between average sagittal condylar guidance angle values obtained from CBCT and protrusive interocclusal records differed depending on the method of registration. For protrusive interocclusal records, axiographic or pantographic measurement variance analysis showed that the condylar inclination values recorded with wax were statistically lower than those recorded with a pantograph (P<.05). Conclusions: Although CBCT appears to be the most suitable method of evaluating the sagittal condylar guidance angle, the limitations and discrepancies among methods, including protrusive interocclusal records and panoramic and cephalometric radiographs, should be acknowledged. Digital axiography, with its potential to capture comprehensive functional data, may surpass other techniques. The use of mean values for articulators may be a practical solution for some patients. Further research is needed to refine sagittal condylar guidance angle assessment methods and to develop more reproducible and reliable approaches for the future.

Comparative evaluation of condylar guidance obtained by three different interocclusal recording materials in a semi-adjustable articulator and digital panoramic radiographic images in dentate patients: An in vivo study

Comparison of Sagittal Condylar Guidance Angle Obtained by Radiographic Methods and Manual Programming of Articulators in Dentate Patients - A Clinico-radiographic Study

Comparative evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from a clinical method and with cone beam computed tomography in dentate individuals

Comparison of condylar guidance setting obtained from a wax record versus an extraoral tracing: a pilot study

Comparative evaluation of condylar inclination in dentulous subjects as determined by two radiographic methods: Orthopantomograph and cone-beam computed tomography - An in vivo study

A comparative assessment of condylar inclination in completely edentulous patients using cone beam computed tomography and Arcus digma II

Evaluation of sagittal inclination of occlusal plane and horizontal condylar guidance using various anterior reference points on arcon and nonarcon articulators

A Comparison of Occlusal Schemes with Condylar Inclination and Anterior Guidance in Dentate Individuals

In Vitro Assessment of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Types of Interocclusal Recording Materials

A comparative study to measure the sagittal condylar inclination using mechanical articulator, virtual articulator and jaw tracking device

Evaluation of the accuracy of a fully digital method of measuring sagittal condylar inclination

Sagittal condylar guidance angle measurement methods: A systematic review

A clinical comparative study of Cadiax Compact II and intraoral records using wax and addition silicone

Condylar guidance: correlation between articular morphology and panoramic radiographic images in dry human skulls

Complicated Relationships between Anterior and Condylar Guidance and Their Clinical Implications-Comparison by Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Electronic Axiography-An Observational Cohort Cross-Sectional Study

Sagittal Condylar Inclination and Transversal Condylar Inclination in Different Skeletal Classes

A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of the Relationship between Incisal and Condylar Guidance

Evaluating sagittal condylar inclination: a comparative analysis of various digital workflow measures

Evaluating condylar head morphology as it relates to the skeletal vertical facial dimension: A three-dimensional semi-automated landmark study

Clinical occlusion analysis versus semi-adjustable articulator and virtual articulator occlusion analysis

Evaluation of accuracy of transfer of the maxillary occlusal cant of two articulators using two facebow/semi-adjustable articulator systems: An in vivo study