Abstract:This dissertation studies the importance of firm-level price markup dynamics for business cycle fluctuations. In chapter one, I use recent IO techniques to measure the behavior of markups over the business cycle at the firm level. I find that markups are countercyclical with an average elasticity of -0.9 with respect to real GDP, in line with the earlier industrylevel evidence. Importantly, I find substantial heterogeneity in markup cyclicality across firms, with small firms having significantly more countercyclical markups than large firms. In chapter two, I examine if two prominent models in the literature are consistent with the empirical findings. First, I explore the Atkeson and Burstein (2008) model of oligopolistic competition. Coupled with an exogenous second-moment shock to firm productivities, this model results in a countercyclical average markup, but predicts that smaller firms reduce their markups in recessions. Second, I calibrate both Calvo and menu cost models of price stickiness to match the empirical heterogeneity in price durations as in Goldberg and Hellerstein (2011). I find that both models can match the average counter-cyclicality of markups in response to monetary shocks. Quantitatively, however, only the menu cost model, through its selection e↵ect, can match the extent of the empirical heterogeneity in markup cyclicality. In addition, both sticky price models imply pro-cyclical markup behavior in response to productivity shocks. In chapter three, I develop a new general equilibrium model that embeds customer capital into a standard firm dynamics model with entry and exit. A key feature of the model is that a firm’s decision about markups becomes dynamic – firms accumulate customer capital in the periods of fast growth by charging low markups, and choose to exploit it by charging high markups in the downturns. In particular, during recessions, the endogenous higher exit probability for smaller firms implies that they place lower weight on future profits, leading them to charge higher markups. This mechanism serves to endogenously increase the dispersion of firm sales and employment in recessions. Also, the resulting input misallocation iii amplifies both the volatility and persistence of the exogenous productivity shocks driving the business cycle.

Business Cycle Implications of Firm Market Power in Labor and Product Markets

Quantifying Market Power and Business Dynamism

A Comment on: "Walras–Bowley Lecture: Market Power and Wage Inequality" by Shubhdeep Deb, Jan Eeckhout, Aseem Patel, and Lawrence Warren

Quantifying Sources of Labor Market Power

Cyclicality and Heterogeneity of Price Markup

Monetary Policy, Productivity, and Market Concentration

Prominence And Market Power: Asymmetric Oligopoly With Sequential Consumer Search

Emerging Market Business Cycles: the Role of Labor Market Frictions

Firm Heterogeneity, Market Power and Macroeconomic Fragility

Exploitation of labor? Classical monopsony power and labor's share

The Rise of Market Power and the Macroeconomic Implications*

Estimating Labor Market Power

Market power and income disparities: How can firms influence the gap between capital and labor earnings

The “Matthew effect” and market concentration: Search complementarities and monopsony power

Market concentration and productivity: evidence from the UK

Competition, Monopoly Power and the Uniform Rate of Profit

Declining Dynamism, Increasing Markups and Missing Growth: The Role of the Labor Force

Macroeconomics and Market Power: Context, Implications, and Open Questions

Political Power and Market Power

Monopsony, Job Tasks, and Labour Market Concentration

Turbulent Business Cycles