Abstract:We study the efficiency of allocations in large markets with a network structure where every seller owns an edge in a graph and every buyer desires a path connecting some nodes. While it is known that stable allocations in such settings can be very inefficient, the exact properties of equilibria in markets with multiple sellers are not fully understood even in single-source single-sink networks. In this work, we show that for a large class of natural buyer demand functions, we are guaranteed the existence of an equilibrium with several desirable properties. The crucial insight that we gain into the equilibrium structure allows us to obtain tight bounds on efficiency in terms of the various parameters governing the market, especially the number of monopolies M. All of our efficiency results extend to markets without the network structure. While it is known that monopolies can cause large inefficiencies in general, our main results for single-source single-sink networks indicate that for several natural demand functions the efficiency only drops linearly with M. For example, for concave demand we prove that the efficiency loss is at most a factor 1+M/2 from the optimum, for demand with monotone hazard rate it is at most 1+M, and for polynomial demand the efficiency decreases logarithmically with M. In contrast to previous work that showed that monopolies may adversely affect welfare, our main contribution is showing that monopolies may not be as `evil' as they are made out to be; the loss in efficiency is bounded in many natural markets. Finally, we consider more general, multiple-source networks and show that in the absence of monopolies, mild assumptions on the network topology guarantee an equilibrium that maximizes social welfare.

Competition, Monopoly Power and the Uniform Rate of Profit

Competition, Monopoly, and Differentils of Profit Rates: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Evidence

Continuous optical monitoring during the prompt emission of GRB 060111B

The Economic Institutions of Capitalism

Price-Competition and Compatibility in the Presence of Positive Demand Externalities

The Driving Force of Competition:An Integrated Theory of Neoclassical School and Austrian School on Competition

Price Competition in Networked Markets: How do monopolies impact social welfare?

Monopolistic Competition When Income Matters

A Comment on: "Walras–Bowley Lecture: Market Power and Wage Inequality" by Shubhdeep Deb, Jan Eeckhout, Aseem Patel, and Lawrence Warren

Strategic Inattention, Inflation Dynamics, and the Non-Neutrality of Money

Natural Selection, Irrationality and Monopolistic Competition

The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition

Pricing with algorithms

Quantifying the Gap between Equilibrium and Optimum Under Monopolistic Competition

Quantifying Market Power and Business Dynamism

Stability in Competition

Misunderstandings And Explanations Of "Excessive Competition"

Innovating Big Tech Firms and Competition Policy: Favoring Dynamic Over Static Competition

A study on the development of Marxist competition theory

Monetary Policy, Productivity, and Market Concentration

Selling Complementary Goods: Dynamics, Efficiency and Revenue