Abstract:As the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) moves to the final stages of its work on base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS), this paper reflects on the most promising directions for legislative changes and other action which developing countries might take to protect their corporate tax bases. The paper observes that the barriers facing developing countries generally do not arise from technical difficulties in designing and implementing legislative measures. Indeed, effective controls on base erosion are well-known among policy-makers, particularly limitations on outbound deductions and withholding taxes to discourage excessive outbound payments to affiliates. Instead, the most important impediment to effective control of base erosion is the pressure of tax competition – namely, the fear that effectively imposing income taxes on inbound investors will deter employment and economic growth. The paper does not seek to assess the objective validity of this fear, but observes that it is in fact pervasive, and that effective policy-making must recognise the practical political barriers this fear imposes. With the seriousness of tax competition borne in mind, the paper enumerates and briefly comments on the following topics, all of which should be developed in future research efforts: (i) the possible utility of simplified measures to discourage base erosion, notably the greater use of withholding taxes (a measure which the OECD’s BEPS effort has not sought to address); (ii) the potential for both incremental changes to transfer pricing rules to facilitate enforcement and administration (for example, the use of Brazil-style standard margins and markups), as well as the longer-term possibility of unitary taxation; (iii) the importance of regional coordination of tax policies to mitigate tax competition; and (iv) the continuing role of international groups such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and non-government organisations in assisting developing countries to generate realistic assessments of the trade-off which may exist between effective corporate taxation and inbound investment.

Taxing Intellectual Property in the Global Economy: A Plea for Regulated and Internationally Coordinated Profit Splitting

Residual profit splitting: a theory-based approach to tax multinationals

IP Box Regimes and Multinational Enterprises: Does Nexus Pay Off?

Intellectual Property Income as “Per Se” Passive Income: A Comparative Analysis of Controlled Foreign Company Rules in the European Union before and after the Implementation of the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (2016/1164)

International Taxation in the Digital Economy: Challenge Accepted?

The OECD’s Work on Profit Allocation and Nexus Rules for a Digitalized Economy – A Potential Improvement of the International Taxation Framework?

Taxing the Digital Economy Post BEPS ... Seriously

Improving the Resolution of International Tax Disputes

Tax havens and cross-border licensing with transfer pricing regulation

Digital Economy and Profit Allocation: The Application of the Profit Split Method to the Value Created by a “Significant Digital Presence”

On the Interdependency of Profit Shifting Channels and the Effectiveness of Anti-Avoidance Legislation

Beyond BEPS: A Tax Policy Agenda for Developing Countries

Transfer Pricing the Cloud: Tax Characterization of International Trade of Digital Goods and Services between Related Parties

BEPS Project and International Tax Reform: The 2021 Agreements on Taxing Multinational Companies

OECD Consultations on the Digital Economy: ‘Tax Base Reallocation’ and ‘I’ll Tax If You Don’t’?

Reflections on the Fight against Aggressive Tax Planning (When the Law Is Silent)

Income Shifting and International Transfer Pricing: A Three-Country Example

Public international law, international taxation and tax dispute resolution

Taxing intangible assets: issues and challenges for a digital Europe

Consolidated financial statements and global tax policy (OECD BEPS) insights from a multijurisdictional case study