Abstract:The international tax framework relies on early-twentieth-centuryprinciples and favors the interests of the Global North,which created it. It bases taxing rights on a corporation’s physicalpresence and mostly allocates profits to the country of residence.Moreover, it has been slow to adapt to modern business practices.In the digital economy, companies shift profits with relative easeand often do not require a physical presence in the location of theirconsumers. International taxation needs reform, but leadingproposals do not reflect meaningful input from the Global South andare unlikely to serve the needs of developing countries.In 2021, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation andDevelopment (OECD), known informally as the “World TaxOrganization,” introduced new rules for the cross-border taxation ofmultinational enterprises. The new rules intend to address the taxchallenges of digitalization and profit-shifting, and they are likelythe most significant change to international taxation in severaldecades. However, the OECD does not represent the interests of developing economies, and the proposed reform has not remediedthe historic imbalance which disfavors the Global South.This Article highlights the shortcomings of the OECD’smultilateral efforts in the context of taxation and digitalization. Itanalyzes the political lawmaking of the OECD and presents the newrules as a compromise that fails to address inequities in cross-bordertaxation. The Article argues that the reform undermines taxsovereignty and that the current international tax regime overlooksthe involvement of the world’s developing countries. It asserts thatattempts to promote inclusivity within the OECD have largely beenexpressive and that the international tax framework inherentlydisadvantages developing countries and their interests. The Articleproposes steps to promote the equal-footed participation ofdeveloping countries in future international tax policy initiatives.First, it recommends expanding voting rights for non-memberswithin the OECD. Second, it supports the creation of a newintergovernmental framework within the United Nations that isbetter positioned to revisit traditional international tax normsthrough a genuinely inclusive process.

Taxing the Digital Economy Post BEPS ... Seriously

International Taxation in the Digital Economy: Challenge Accepted?

Tax administration of digital economy: Concepts, problems and directions of development

International Tax Reform: Challenges to Multilateral Cooperation

BEPS Project and International Tax Reform: The 2021 Agreements on Taxing Multinational Companies

Beyond BEPS: A Tax Policy Agenda for Developing Countries

Designing effective policies to address the challenges of global digital tax reforms

The Spanish Digital Services Tax: A Paradigm for the Base Enlargement & Profit Attraction (BEPA) Plan for the Digitalized Economy

OECD’s Work on the Digital Economy: Impact Far beyond the Digital Economy

CHALLENGES TO THE TAXATION OF THE DIGITAL ECONOMY

OECD Consultations on the Digital Economy: ‘Tax Base Reallocation’ and ‘I’ll Tax If You Don’t’?

Tax havens reexamined: The impact of global digital tax reforms on international taxation

When digital taxes come due: national digital taxes and the negotiation of the OECD inclusive framework

Digital Services Tax: Challenge of International Cooperation For Harmonization

The OECD’s Work on Profit Allocation and Nexus Rules for a Digitalized Economy – A Potential Improvement of the International Taxation Framework?

Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy: The Development of the OECD Project and Possible Implementation in Russia

The challenges of taxation in the digital economy: analysis of the Ecuadorian tax system

Challenges of the Digital Era Development in Relation to Tax Systems. Taxing the Digital Economy

Public international law, international taxation and tax dispute resolution