Models of Signification and Pedagogy in J. L. Austin, John Searle, and Jacques Derrida

Johanna Hartelius
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2012.754930
2013-01-01
Review of Communication
Abstract:John Searle and Jacques Derrida's legendary dispute over J. L. Austin's speech act theory is commonly interpreted as a conflict over first assumptions and/or as an historic engagement between the French-German and American-English philosophical traditions. This essay proposes that from Searle's and Derrida's respective interpretations and deployments of Austin's work alternate pedagogies may be explicated. Searle and Derrida differed in their responses not only to speech act theory itself, but importantly also to Austin's act of formulating speech act theory, as a function of their respective language philosophies. Analyzing the two theorists' understandings of signification and intentionality and how each oriented himself relative to a project that influenced his work, I present two teaching models. The essay extends the literature on academic pedagogy by identifying teaching models in teachers' scholarly subjects. Moreover, as my investigation of teaching and signification follows students' assumptions about what is rhetorically possible, it joins the ongoing disciplinary conversation about the efficacy and agency of language and language-users.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?