Abstract:In this essay, which is a response to five papers on Heidegger and education but can also be read independently, I argue that it is only when we introduce the German distinction between ‘Bildung’ and ‘Erziehung’ that it becomes possible to discuss in sufficient detail the possibilities and limitations of a Heideggerian account of and engagement with ‘education’. Central to my argument is the suggestion that whereas Heidegger provides a radical critique of the humanistic foundations of ‘Bildung’, he nonetheless remains caught in the ‘logic’ of ‘Bildung’ by assuming that education ultimately has to do with the becoming of the self. The difference Heidegger seeks to make is that this becoming of the self does not take place through an engagement with the world of beings—the world of things about which we can have positive knowledge—but rather takes place in the encounter with the Being of beings—an encounter in which Being shows itself to us, and we are receivers and custodians of Being. Against this background I show that what is absent in this configuration is an altogether different possibility, not one where we are listening, but one where we are being addressed or, in other educational terms, where we are being taught. Whereas several authors of the papers under discussion seem to have a certain fear of teaching on the assumption that teaching can only appear as an act of power that limits rather than that it enhances freedom, I explore the opposite option—one where the act of teaching and the experience of being taught are precisely aimed at my freedom, albeit that this freedom is not understood as sovereignty but in terms of authority, that is, in relation to working through the difficult challenge as to what legitimately should have power over me. This altogether different educational possibility brings us from the logic of ‘Bildung’ to the logic of ‘Erziehung’. Whereas Heidegger and some of the authors of the papers under discussion did try to ‘move’ education understood as ‘Bildung’ from beings to Being, the shift from ‘Bildung’ to ‘Erziehung’ seems not to have been considered explicitly, although it is addressed and in a sense enacted by some of the essays. I conclude by arguing that it is only when we are able to overcome our fear of teaching that the humanism that troubles ‘Bildung’ can really be addressed.

Derrida on Language and Philosophical Education

Contradictions in Educational Thought and Practice: Derrida, Philosophy, and Education

Alain Badiou and Education

Language and imagined Gesellschaft: Émile Durkheim's civil-linguistic nationalism and the consequences of universal human ideals

"German Matador" and French Philosophy: About the Identity of French Philosophy from the Point of View of National Language

Linguistics for Intercultural Education

Academic Discourse: Linguistic Misunderstanding and Professorial Power

Rousseau on Language and Writing

A Confrontation between National Identity and Foreign Ideas:German Reception of John Dewey’s Educational Thought between the Early 20th Century and the Pre-period of World War II

Toward a Theory of Interpretation in Dewey's Educational Philosophy

Derrida and Searl

Who’s Afraid of Teaching? Heidegger and the Question of Education (‘Bildung’/‘Erziehung’)

Merleau-Ponty from perception to language. New elements of interpretation

Where is education? Arendt's educational philosophy in between private and public

The Dilemma of Inclusive Education: Inclusion for Some or Inclusion for All

The Deconstructive Strategies of Jacques Derrida

Towards Ordinary Language Philosophy: The Linguistic Turn in Line with the Interpretations of M. Bakhtin and M. Heidegger

Models of Signification and Pedagogy in J. L. Austin, John Searle, and Jacques Derrida

Asserting Law and Justice in Despair:Derrida's View on the Deconstruction of Law

Methodologies of English Learning in the View of Philosophy of Education

The Centrality of Language and Reading