Abstract:Practice of movement in virtual-reality and other artificially altered environments has been proposed as a method for rehabilitation following neurological injury and for training new skills in healthy humans. For such training to be useful, there must be transfer of learning from the artificial environment to the performance of desired skills in the natural environment. Therefore an important assumption of such methods is that practice in the altered environment engages the same learning and plasticity mechanisms that are required for skill performance in the natural environment. We test the hypothesis that transfer of learning may fail because the learning and plasticity mechanism that adapts to the altered environment is different from the learning mechanism required for improvement of motor skill. In this paper, we propose that a model that separates skill learning and environmental adaptation is necessary to explain the learning and aftereffects that are observed in virtual reality experiments. In particular, we studied the condition where practice in the altered environment should lead to correct skill performance in the original environment. Our 2-mechanism model predicts that aftereffects will still be observed when returning to the original environment, indicating a lack of skill transfer from the artificial environment to the original environment. To illustrate the model prediction, we tested 10 healthy participants on the interaction between a simple overlearned motor skill (straight hand movements to targets in different directions) and an artificially altered visuomotor environment (rotation of visual feedback of the results of movement). As predicted by the models, participants show adaptation to the altered environment and after-effects on return to the baseline environment even when practice in the altered environment should have led to correct skill performance. The presence of aftereffect under all conditions that involved changes in environment demonstrates separation of environmental adaptation and skill learning. Our results support the existence of two distinct learning modules with different adaptation properties. Therefore we suggest that adaptation to an altered environment may not be useful for training new skills.

A Model for the Transfer of Perceptual-Motor Skill Learning in Human Behaviors

Specific and general transfer of perceptual-motor skills and learning between sports: A systematic review

[The learning and motor development transfer process]

Conceptual Model of Life Skills Transfer in Sport

Acquisition of Intellectual and Perceptual-Motor Skills

Influence of error-augmentation on the dynamics of visuomotor skill acquisition: insights from proxy-process models

Relationship between skill training and skill transfer through the example of bimanual motor learning

Successful Transfer of a Motor Learning Strategy to a Novel Sport

Two different motor learning mechanisms contribute to learning reaching movements in a rotated visual environment

From eyes to hands: Transfer of learning in the Simon task across motor effectors

Investigating mechanisms of sport-related cognitive improvement using measures of motor learning

Training Transfer: Scientific Background and Insights for Practical Application

Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning

Motor learning in real-world pool billiards

Behavioral Motor Performance

Skill acquisition via motor imagery relies on both motor and perceptual learning.

Modified perceptual training in sport: A new classification framework

Cognitive & motor skill transfer across speeds: A video game study

Mind in action: the interplay of cognition and action in skilled performance

Transferring motivation from educational to extramural contexts: a review of the trans-contextual model

Motor adaptation to environment changes predicting interactable object behaviour can be flexible and implicit