Abstract:BackgroundDue to the increasing demand on primary care, it is not only debated whether there are enough general practitioners (GPs) to comply with these demands but also whether specific tasks can be performed by other care providers. Although changing the workforce skill mix care by employing Physician Assistants (PAs) and Nurse Practitioners (NPs) has proven to be both effective and safe, the implementation of those professionals differs widely between and within countries. To support policy making regarding PAs/NPs in primary care, the aim of this study is to provide insight into factors influencing the decision of GPs and managers to train and employ a PA/NP within their organisation.MethodsA qualitative study was conducted in 2014 in which 7 managers of out-of-hours primary care services and 32 GPs who owned a general practice were interviewed. Three main topic areas were covered in the interviews: the decision-making process in the organisation, considerations and arguments to train and employ a PA/NP, and the tasks and responsibilities of a PA/NP.ResultsEmployment of PAs/NPs in out-of-hours services was intended to substitute care for minor ailments in order to decrease GPs’ caseload or to increase service capacity. Mangers formulated long-term planning and role definitions when changing workforce skill mix. Lastly, out-of-hours services experienced difficulties with creating team support among their members regarding the employment of PAs/NPs.In general practices during office hours, GPs indented both substitution and supplementation for minor ailments and/or target populations through changing the skill mix. Supplementation was aimed at improving quality of care and extending the range of services to patients. The decision-making in general practices was accompanied with little planning and role definition. The willingness to employ PAs/NPs was highly influenced by an employees’ motivation to start the master’s programme and GPs’ prior experience with PAs/NPs. Knowledge about the PA/NP profession and legislations was often lacking.ConclusionsRole standardisations, long-term political planning and support from professional associations are needed to support policy makers in implementing skill mix in primary care.

Physician Assistants and Nurse Practitioners

Exploring the role of physician associates in Aotearoa New Zealand primary health care

Physician Assistant Training, Collaboration, and Practice Act Legislation: Perspectives From Practicing Physician Assistants

A policy analysis of nurse practitioner scope of practice in Massachusetts

Factors influencing decision of general practitioners and managers to train and employ a nurse practitioner or physician assistant in primary care: a qualitative study

Nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and trust

Full Scope-of-Practice Regulation Is Associated With Higher Supply of Nurse Practitioners in Rural and Primary Care Health Professional Shortage Counties

Primary care teams: are we there yet? Implications for workforce planning

Geriatric medicine in the United States: New roles for physician assistants

Physician Assistants in Plastic Surgery: A Descriptive Analysis Using the National Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants Dataset

Observations on the Global Spread of Physician Assistant Education

Quality of primary care by advanced practice nurses: a systematic review

Concerns over physician associates are missing the wood for the trees

Physician associates in primary health care in England: A challenge to professional boundaries?

Weighing the Evidence for Expanding Physician Supply

Are physician associates higher risk than other healthcare professionals?

Physician assistants/associates in psychiatry: a workforce analysis

US Primary Care Workforce Growth: A Decade of Limited Progress, and Projected Needs Through 2040

Physician associate deployment in primary care: running before walking

Ethical conflict in nurse practitioners and physician assistants in managed care

Physician associates have a place in primary care