Abstract:Uncertainty in a hydrodynamic model originates from input data, model structure and parameters. In order to provide the robust model predictions, the Bayesian model averaging (BMA) approach could be used as a multimodel combining method to account for the compound effects from various uncertainty sources. However, BMA cannot provide a clear picture of the impact from individual uncertainty sources. Hierarchical Bayesian model averaging (HBMA) is a recently developed approach to study the relative impact of different uncertainty sources, which explicitly considers various sources of uncertainty in the hierarchical structure (BMA tree) for analysing uncertainty propagation. In this study, HBMA is tested over the Black River watershed in Missouri and Arkansas based on water stage predictions from 243 LISFLOOD-FP model configurations that integrate five sources of uncertainty including channel shape, channel width, channel roughness, topography and flow forcing. To compare, the model perturbation approach is also applied in this study to investigate the influence of individual uncertainty sources on model prediction. Overall, the results indicate that HBMA provides an alternative way for flood modellers to deal with modelling uncertainty in data sparse region when multiple choices of uncertainty sources are considered. Findings from Black River watershed point out that without considering the model weight (model perturbation approach), channel width and topographical data resolution have the largest impact on the hydrodynamic model predictions followed by flow forcing, which has a relatively greater influence than channel cross-sectional shape and model parameter. However, when model weights are taken into account (HBMA), model input (topography and flow forcing) and model parameter have a larger impact on prediction variance than model structure (channel width and cross-sectional shape). Moreover, as results move up the hierarchy along the BMA tree, the accuracy of deterministic mean prediction also increases in general whereas the 95% confidence interval associated with the deterministic mean prediction might become larger.

Hierarchical Bayesian model averaging for hydrostratigraphic modeling: Uncertainty segregation and comparative evaluation

Separation and Prioritization of Uncertainty Sources in a Raster Based Flood Inundation Model Using Hierarchical Bayesian Model Averaging

Uncertainty in High and Low Flows Due to Model Structure and Parameter Errors

Uncertainty Analysis in Statistical Modeling of Extreme Hydrological Events

Accounting for Model Structure, Parameter and Input Forcing Uncertainty in Flood Inundation Modeling Using Bayesian Model Averaging

Assessing Groundwater Modeling Uncertainty By Model Averaging Method

Assessing Bayesian Model Averaging Uncertainty of Groundwater Modeling Based on Information Entropy Method

Uncertainty Evaluation of a Groundwater Conceptual Model by Using a Multimodel Averaging Method

Uncertainty evaluation of groundwater modeling based on multimodel method

Calibration of a Distributed Flood Forecasting Model with Input Uncertainty Using a Bayesian Framework

A Bayesian Hierarchical Model Framework to Quantify Uncertainty of Tropical Cyclone Precipitation Forecasts

Hierarchical Stochastic Model in Bayesian Inference: Theoretical Implications and Efficient Approximation

Bayesian calibration of HEC-HMS model using two different algorithms

Statistical post-processing of hydrological forecasts using Bayesian model averaging

Probabilistic Forecast and Uncertainty Assessment of Hydrologic Design Values Using Bayesian Theories

A Bayesian Approach for the Identification of Pollution Source in Water Quality Model Coupled with Hydrodynamics

Optimized Predictive Coverage by Averaging Time‐Windowed Bayesian Distributions

Bayesian analysis for uncertainty and risk in a groundwater numerical model's predictions

Improving Hydrological Model Simulations with Combined Multi-Input and Multimodel Averaging Frameworks

A Bayesian hierarchical framework for post-processing daily streamflow simulations across a river network

Application of Bayesian Model Averaging in the Reconstruction of Past Climate Change Using PMIP3/CMIP5 Multimodel Ensemble Simulations