Abstract:Abstract. The degree of belief we have in predictions from hydrologic models will normally depend on how well they can reproduce observations. Calibrations with traditional performance measures, such as the Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency, are challenged by problems including: (1) uncertain discharge data, (2) variable sensitivity of different performance measures to different flow magnitudes, (3) influence of unknown input/output errors and (4) inability to evaluate model performance when observation time periods for discharge and model input data do not overlap. This paper explores a calibration method using flow-duration curves (FDCs) to address these problems. The method focuses on reproducing the observed discharge frequency distribution rather than the exact hydrograph. It consists of applying limits of acceptability for selected evaluation points (EPs) on the observed uncertain FDC in the extended GLUE approach. Two ways of selecting the EPs were tested – based on equal intervals of discharge and of volume of water. The method was tested and compared to a calibration using the traditional model efficiency for the daily four-parameter WASMOD model in the Paso La Ceiba catchment in Honduras and for Dynamic TOPMODEL evaluated at an hourly time scale for the Brue catchment in Great Britain. The volume method of selecting EPs gave the best results in both catchments with better calibrated slow flow, recession and evaporation than the other criteria. Observed and simulated time series of uncertain discharges agreed better for this method both in calibration and prediction in both catchments. An advantage with the method is that the rejection criterion is based on an estimation of the uncertainty in discharge data and that the EPs of the FDC can be chosen to reflect the aims of the modelling application, e.g. using more/less EPs at high/low flows. While the method appears less sensitive to epistemic input/output errors than previous use of limits of acceptability applied directly to the time series of discharge, it still requires a reasonable representation of the distribution of inputs. Additional constraints might therefore be required in catchments subject to snow and where peak-flow timing at sub-daily time scales is of high importance. The results suggest that the calibration method can be useful when observation time periods for discharge and model input data do not overlap. The method could also be suitable for calibration to regional FDCs while taking uncertainties in the hydrological model and data into account.

Calibration of a Distributed Flood Forecasting Model with Input Uncertainty Using a Bayesian Framework

Uncertainty in High and Low Flows Due to Model Structure and Parameter Errors

Numerical Approach for Water Distribution System Model Calibration Through Incorporation of Multiple Stochastic Prior Distributions.

Optimization of rain gauge sampling density for river discharge prediction using Bayesian calibration

Evaluation of Uncertainties in Input Data and Parameters of a Hydrological Model Using a Bayesian Framework: A Case Study of a Snowmelt–Precipitation-Driven Watershed

Development and Comparison in Uncertainty Assessment Based Bayesian Modularization Method in Hydrological Modeling

Uncertainty Quantification of Hydrological Predictions Using a Hierarchical Error Model

Hydrological model calibration with uncertain discharge data

Uncertainty quantization of meteorological input and model parameters for hydrological modelling using a Bayesian‐based integrated approach

Uncertainty Estimates by Bayesian Method with Likelihood of AR (1) Plus Normal Model and AR (1) Plus Multi-Normal Model in Different Time-Scales Hydrological Models

Calibration of Hydrological Models Using Flow-Duration Curves

Bayesian calibration of HEC-HMS model using two different algorithms

Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis in hydrological modeling

Utilizing Satellite Surface Soil Moisture Data in Calibrating a Distributed Hydrological Model Applied in Humid Regions Through a Multi-Objective Bayesian Hierarchical Framework.

A Framework for Automatic Calibration of SWMM Considering Input Uncertainty

Accounting for Model Structure, Parameter and Input Forcing Uncertainty in Flood Inundation Modeling Using Bayesian Model Averaging

Estimating Daily Time Series of Streamflow Using Hydrological Model Calibrated Based on Satellite Observations of River Water Surface Width: Toward Real World Applications.

Assessing Uncertainties in a Conceptual Water Balance Model Using Bayesian Methodology / Estimation Bayésienne Des Incertitudes Au Sein D’une Modélisation Conceptuelle De Bilan Hydrologique

A Bayesian Analysis of Selecting the Appropriate Rainfall to Calibrate the Highly Uncertain Swmm Model

Calibration of hydrological models in ungauged basins based on satellite radar altimetry observations of river water level

Assessing uncertainties in a conceptual water balance model using Bayesian methodology / Estimation bayesienne des incertitudes au sein d'une modelisation conceptuelle de bilan hydrologique