Abstract:The prevalence of childhood obesity is increasing globally (1) . While BMI is commonly used to define obesity, it is unable to differentiate between fat and muscle mass, leading to calls to measure body composition specifically (2) . While several tools are available to assess body composition in infancy, it is unclear if they are directly comparable. Among a subset of healthy infants born to mothers participating in a randomised controlled trial of a preconception and antenatal nutritional supplement (3) , measurements were made at ages 6 weeks (n = 58) and 6 months (n = 70) using air displacement plethysmography (ADP), whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS). Estimates of percentage fat mass (%FM) were compared using Cohen's kappa statistic (κ) and Bland-Altman analysis (4,5) . There was none to weak agreement when comparing tertiles of %FM (κ = 0.15–0.59). When comparing absolute values, the bias (i.e., mean difference) was smallest when comparing BIS to ADP at 6 weeks (+1.7%). A similar bias was observed at 6 months when comparing DXA to ADP (+1.8%). However, when comparing BIA to DXA at both ages, biases were much larger (+7.6% and +4.7% at 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively). Furthermore, there was wide interindividual variance (limits of agreement [LOA] i.e., ± 1.96 SD) for each comparison. At 6 weeks, LOA ranged from ± 4.8 to ± 6.5% for BIA vs. DXA and BIA vs. ADP, respectively. At 6 months, LOA were even wider, ranging from ± 7.3 to ± 8.1% (DXA vs. ADP and BIA vs. DXA, respectively). Proportional biases were apparent when comparing BIS to the other tools at both ages, with BIS generally overestimating %FM more among infants with low adiposity. In addition to differences according to tool type, within-tool factors impacted body composition estimation. For ADP measurements, the choice of FFM density reference (Fomon vs. Butte) had minimal impact; however, choice of DXA software version (GE Lunar enCORE basic vs. enhanced) and BIS analysis approach (empirical equation vs. mixture theory prediction) led to very different estimates of body composition. In conclusion, when comparing body composition assessment tools in infancy, there was limited agreement between three commonly used tools. Therefore, researchers and clinicians must be cautious when conducting longitudinal analyses or when comparing findings across studies, as estimates are not comparable across tools.

Body composition in 18‐ to 88‐year‐old adults—comparison of multifrequency bioimpedance and dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry

Body Composition In 18-To 88-Year-Old Adultscomparison Of Multifrequency Bioimpedance And Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry

Assessing Body Composition With Dxa And Bioimpedance: Effects Of Obesity, Physical Activity, And Age

Comparison of body composition measures assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the United Kingdom Biobank

Comparison of two bioelectrical impedance analysis devices with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of body composition.

Comparisons of body-composition prediction accuracy: a study of 2 bioelectric impedance consumer devices in healthy Chinese persons using DXA and MRI as criteria methods.

Compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance effectively monitors longitudinal changes in body composition in children and adolescents with obesity during a lifestyle intervention

Comparative Analysis of the Multi-Frequency Bio-impedance and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry on Body Composition in Obese Subjects.

Determination of body fat percentage by bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Assessment of Body Composition in Health and Disease Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) and Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA): A Critical Overview

Body Composition Analyses in Older Adults May Vary Significantly Depending on the Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer Modality

Comparison of bioelectrical impedance consumer device with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the assessment of muscle mass in Chinese geriatric inpatients

Body Composition Analysis by Using Bioelectrical Impedance in a Young Healthy Chinese Population: Methodological Considerations

[Comparative analysis of body fat measurement using two bioelectric impedance devices and three household scales (with the function of determining body composition) with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry]

Comparing DXA and MRI body composition measurements in cross-sectional and longitudinal cohorts

Body fat percentage assessment by skinfold equation, bioimpedance and densitometry in older adults

Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Demonstrates Reliable Agreement with Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Identifying Reduced Skeletal Muscle Mass in Patients with Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease and Hypertension

Comparison of body composition assessment tools in infancy

Difference in Body Composition Patterns between Age Groups in Italian Individuals with Overweight and Obesity: When BMI Becomes a Misleading Tool in Nutritional Settings

Measurement of lean body mass using bioelectrical impedance analysis: a consideration of the pros and cons

Comparison BMC Assessed by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Multi-Frequency Bioelectrical Impedance in Chinese Overweight and Obesity Adults