Comparisons Between Dxa And Bioimpedance Devices For Appendicular Lean Mass And Muscle Quality In Hispanic Adults

Bassel Nassar,Grant M. Tinsley,Kyung-Shin Park,Stefan A. Czerwinski,Brett S. Nickerson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s000711452400076x
2024-04-17
British Journal Of Nutrition
Abstract:The purpose of this study was to compare single- and multi-frequency bioimpedance (BIA) devices against dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for appendicular lean mass (ALM) and muscle quality index (MQI) metrics in Hispanic adults. One-hundred thirty-one Hispanic adults (18–55 yrs.) participated in this study. ALM was measured with single-frequency (SFBIA), multi-frequency (MFBIA), and DXA. ALM TOTAL (left arm + right arm + left leg + right leg) and ALM ARMS (left arm + right arm) were computed for all three devices. Handgrip strength (HGS) was measured using a dynamometer. The average HGS was used for all MQI models (highest left hand + highest right hand)/2. MQI ARMS was defined as the ratio between HGS and ALM ARMS . MQI TOTAL was established as the ratio between HGS and ALM TOTAL . SFBIA and MFBIA had strong correlations with DXA for all ALM and MQI metrics (CCC values ranged from 0.86 [MQI MFBIA-ARMS ] to 0.97 [Arms LM SFBIA ]; all p < 0.001). Equivalence testing varied between methods (e.g., SFBIA vs. DXA) when examining the different metrics (i.e., ALM TOTAL , ALM ARMS , MQI TOTAL , and MQI ARMS ). MQI ARMS was the only metric that did not differ from the line of identity and had no proportional bias when comparing all the devices against each other. The current study findings demonstrate good overall agreement between SFBIA, MFBIA, and DXA for ALM TOTAL and ALM ARMS in a Hispanic population. However, SFBIA and MFBIA have better agreement with DXA when used to compute MQI ARMS than MQI TOTAL .
nutrition & dietetics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?