Abstract:Open innovation (OI) is high on the commercial and political agenda. It revolves around R&D partnerships, set up to keep up with rapid technological developments. In negotiating such R&D partnerships, the allocation of intellectual property (IP) ownership, in particular patent ownership and trade secret control, is a difficult task. The lack of harmonization of IP law leads to challenges both for collaborating parties and third parties. Many legal patent systems, for instance, impose co-ownership as a default regime for jointly developed technologies. However, under such a regime the exploitation rights may significantly vary and may prescribe the consent of other owners in the case of use, licensing and sale of co-owned patents. These consent requirements may harm the interests of collaborating parties and complicate future exploitation of the technology concerned. To avoid this complexity, parties can establish their own applicable rules. The allocation of trade secret control, on the other hand, is only done on a contractual basis, as legislators do not foresee any default rules on the matter. Typically, the confidential nature of contracts will preclude third parties from obtaining information needed as a basis for initiating an OI process, such as licensing. Neither the default regime, nor the contract-based regime provides the necessary level of transparency and legal certainty to secure the smooth exploitation of jointly developed patents and trade secrets and future engagement in OI for both collaborating parties and third parties. The present paper examines the current IP framework for coupled OI processes in great depth. In addition, this paper reviews recent legislative initiatives to improve legal certainty and transparency, both at the national and EU level, and lists a number of potential legislative measures that could be imposed to further strengthen the legislative framework.

IP Models to Orchestrate Innovation Ecosystems: IMEC, a Public Research Institute in Nano-Electronics

Modelling Strategic Actor Relationships to Support Intellectual Property Management

Value Creation, Value Capturing, and Management Challenges in Innovation Ecosystems

Mapping an Innovation Ecosystem Using Network Clustering and Community Identification: a Multi-Layered Framework.

Intellectual Property Ownership in Coupled Open Innovation Processes

Configuring intellectual property management strategies in co-creation: a contextual perspective

Creativity (Ideas) Management in Industrial R&D Organizations: A Crea-Political Process Model and an Empirical Illustration of Corus RD&T

Intellectual property protection as catalyst for radical technological innovation in national research program teams through innovation milieu and group potentials

Impact of different patent cooperation network models on innovation performance of technology-based SMEs

Innovation Economics Approach to Intellectual Property Law Scholarship

Gaming innovation ecosystem: actors, roles and co-innovation processes

Innovation Systems As Patent Networks: the Netherlands, India and Nanotech

Design Framework of an Ecosystem for Network-Based Innovation: Conceptual Research Methodology

Research on the Coordination Mechanism of Value Cocreation of Innovation Ecosystems: Evidence from a Chinese Artificial Intelligence Enterprise

IMoG -- a methodology for modeling future microelectronic innovations

Study examining the significant role of intellectual property protection in driving radical technological innovation among national research project teams, employing PLS-SEM and ANN modeling

Exploring how different innovation ecosystems create shared value: insights from a multiple case study analysis

Types of open models for high-tech innovation creation and intellectual property protection

The dynamic equilibrium and simulation of mobile internet platform innovation ecosystem: A symbiotic evolution model

"Open Innovation" and "Triple Helix" Models of Innovation: Can Synergy in Innovation Systems Be Measured?

How Ecosystem Management will Influence Business Model Innovation: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice