Abstract:The model of "Open Innovations" (OI) can be compared with the "Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations" (TH) as attempts to find surplus value in bringing industrial innovation closer to public R&D. Whereas the firm is central in the model of OI, the TH adds multi-centeredness: in addition to firms, universities and (e.g., regional) governments can take leading roles in innovation eco-systems. In addition to the (transversal) technology transfer at each moment of time, one can focus on the dynamics in the feedback loops. Under specifiable conditions, feedback loops can be turned into feedforward ones that drive innovation eco-systems towards self-organization and the auto-catalytic generation of new options. The generation of options can be more important than historical realizations ("best practices") for the longer-term viability of knowledge-based innovation systems. A system without sufficient options, for example, is locked-in. The generation of redundancy -- the Triple Helix indicator -- can be used as a measure of unrealized but technologically feasible options given a historical configuration. Different coordination mechanisms (markets, policies, knowledge) provide different perspectives on the same information and thus generate redundancy. Increased redundancy not only stimulates innovation in an eco-system by reducing the prevailing uncertainty; it also enhances the synergy in and innovativeness of an innovation system.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to explore and solve the problem of how to measure synergy in innovation systems. Specifically, the author compares the "Open Innovation" (OI) model with the "Triple Helix University - Industry - Government Relations" (TH) model. Both models aim to find additional value by more closely integrating industrial innovation with public R & D. However, they differ in disciplinary background and policy objectives. The OI model is enterprise - centered, while the TH model adds multi - centrality, that is, in addition to enterprises, universities and (for example, regional) governments can also play a leading role in the innovation ecosystem.
The paper further explores how different coordination mechanisms (market, policy, knowledge) can provide different perspectives to generate redundancy, thereby stimulating innovation in the innovation ecosystem, reducing existing uncertainties, and enhancing the synergy and innovativeness of the innovation system. In particular, the paper proposes that redundancy - that is, the triple - helix indicator - can be used as a measure of unimplemented but technically feasible options under a given historical configuration. This indicates that for the long - term viability of knowledge - based innovation systems, generating options may be more important than historical achievements ("best practices"). A system without enough options, for example, will be locked - in. Therefore, the core problem of the paper is to explore and measure the synergy in these innovation systems and its impact on innovation.