Abstract:Despite the recent success of neural network models in mimicking animal performance on various tasks, critics worry that these models fail to illuminate brain function. We take it that a central approach to explanation in systems neuroscience is that of mechanistic modeling, where understanding the system requires us to characterize its parts, organization, and activities, and how those give rise to behaviors of interest. However, it remains controversial what it takes for a model to be mechanistic, and whether computational models such as neural networks qualify as explanatory on this approach. We argue that certain kinds of neural network models are actually good examples of mechanistic models, when an appropriate notion of mechanistic mapping is deployed. Building on existing work on model-to-mechanism mapping (3M), we describe criteria delineating such a notion, which we call 3M++. These criteria require us, first, to identify an abstract level of description that is still detailed enough to be "runnable", and then, to construct model-to-brain mappings using the same principles as those employed for brain-to-brain mapping across individuals. Perhaps surprisingly, the abstractions required are just those already in use in experimental neuroscience and deployed in the construction of more familiar computational models – just as the principles of inter-brain mappings are very much in the spirit of those already employed in the collection and analysis of data across animals. In a companion paper, we address the relationship between optimization and intelligibility, in the context of functional evolutionary explanations. Taken together, mechanistic interpretations of computational models and the dependencies between form and function illuminated by optimization processes can help us to understand why brain systems are built they way they are.

The pragmatic use of metaphor in empirical psychology

Languaging psychopathology: neurobiology and metaphor

Pragmatic complexity in metaphor interpretation

Ecological Cognition and Metaphor

A Pragmatic Perspective on Chinese Metaphor

What Drives the Use of Metaphorical Language? Negative Insights from Abstractness, Affect, Discourse Coherence and Contextualized Word Representations

Inching Toward a Unified Metatheory for Psychology

An Epistemic Game-theoretic Pragmatics Account of Linguistic Metaphors

Reality and imagination intertwined: A sensorimotor paradox interpretation

Thinking by metaphor, fast and slow: Deliberate Metaphor Theory offers a new model for metaphor and its comprehension

Metaphor, discourse dynamics and register: applications to written descriptions of mental health problems

Toward an Ecological Theory of Concepts

Explanatory models in neuroscience, Part 1: Taking mechanistic abstraction seriously

The “thinking meme” meme

A metaphor-enriched social cognition.

On the use and abuse of metaphors in assessment

No Warfare: Let us render unto metaphor’s paradox we live by

Principles That Promote Bidirectionality in Verbal Metaphor

Making life and mind as clear as possible, but not clearer

Attention to Metaphor

Therapist experiencing of metaphor in person-centered relationships