Editorial: Imagination, cognition, and the arts
Víctor Bermúdez,Renata Gambino,Benito García-Valero,Grazia Pulvirenti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1523760
IF: 3.473
2024-11-28
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Abstract:Imagination has long been and continues to be an enigmatic concept, frequently addressed but rarely fully elucidated, even by prominent philosophers such as Aristotle, Hume, Kant, and Husserl. Its definition and interpretation changes significantly across different heuristic frameworks-philosophical, aesthetic, poetic, and cognitive. The diverse discourses on imagination have generated persistent, unresolved questions regarding its modalities and effects, particularly concerning the construction of aesthetic and symbolic experiences. Symbolic experiences emerge from our capacity to manipulate tangible elements and perceptions of the real world, exploring through imagination their latent potentialities. During the 1970s, imagination was often undervalued, as noted by Huppauf and Wulf: In the aftermath of the radical sixties, scepticism toward the social and political power of the imagination became popular. A political interpretation of the imagination created great expectations but they, it turned out, were mistaken . . . The imagination has had an uneven and controversial history in the modern period. For most of the time, it was considered secondary and ancillary and sometimes even a dangerous human faculty . . . It was placed among the weaknesses of the human nature and, at the same time, seen as an origin of the fear of losing control over reality. It seemed irreconcilable with the idea of self-determination through the production of knowledge in scientific disciplines (see Huppauf & Wulf, 2009, pp. 1-2).Conversely, in recent decades we have witnessed sustained investigation into imagination within cognitive studies, evolutionary anthropology, and cognitive and developmental psychology. Imagination has mainly been recognized as a core representational activity of the mindbrain. Numerous hypotheses and theories underscore different characteristics and functions of imagination (for review, see Brann, 2017;Kearney, 1988;Stevenson, 2003). Some scholars posit that imagination mediates the relationship between perceptions and mental representations, contributing to the construction of the "human imagination spectrum" (McGinn, 2004) and the "multidimensional continuum view" (Nigel, 2014). These frameworks suggest that imagination plays a crucial role in forming a stable representation of the world for each perceiving individual. Imagination, is therefore intended as the cognitive ability which empowers humans to creatively shape their experiences, perceptions, and visions of self and world, as well as memories and emotions.Given its fundamental role in human existence, imagination has gradually become a focal point in contemporary cognitive research. Scholars like Mark Turner emphasize the epistemic necessity of investigating imaginative processes to not only unravel this profound enigma of the human mindbrain but also to elucidate other cognitive faculties that depend on imagination (Turner, 2014). In its vast array of activities, imagination is understood as a complex emergent cognitive faculty intricately linked with perception, memory, and consciousness. It is considered as shaping human life by expanding the boundaries of our perceptual, affective understanding, influencing our actions, memories and our very being. In accordance with the thesis of Lakoff and Johnson, imagination functions by shaping "categorization, reason, propositional and non-propositional forms of thought," through the employment of metaphor and narrative (Lakoff, Johnson, 1980, p. 193).By manipulating and transforming perceptions, experiences and elements of the real world into counterfactual images, imagination reutilizes the somatosensory and motor systems (Gosetti-Ferencei, 2018;Gallese, 2019, pp. 113-127). This imaginative manipulation involves the embodied activation of the sensorimotor system, which is reutilized when the mind processes counterfactual images, elaborates them through language and various media, or engages with mental imagery (Kuzmičová, 2014, pp. 275-293) elicited by literature, visual artworks and different media.Imagination can be observed and described as a complex system exhibiting features known as 'self-organization' or 'emergence,' involving the activation of multiple neural circuits engaged in higher associative cognitive functions. These fundamentally chaotic or complex systems have the capacity to produce patterns that appear non-chaotic and predictable. Drawing on the work of Varela and Thompson, every living organism is an enactive and imagining being, integrating a series of similar processes. From this perspective, imagination can be considered an integrated and dynamic flow of sensorimotor, memorial, visual, and eidetic activations (Varela, Thompson, Rosch 1991;Dennett, Kinsbourne, 1992;Pöppel and Schill, 1995;Varela, Depraz, 2003):Mental acts are characterized by the concurrent participation of several functionally distinct and topographically -Abstract Truncated-
psychology,neurosciences