Comparative performance evaluation of ozone oxidation and coagulation for the treatment of electroplating wastewater

Abdullah Yasar,Aqsa Ghaffar,Yusra Mahfooz,Amtul Bari Tabinda,Adeel Mehmood
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2021.27462
IF: 1.1
2021-01-01
Desalination and Water Treatment
Abstract:Various attempts have been made to assess the wastewater characteristics (pH, biochemical oxygen demand, and chemical oxygen demand) and heavy metals (nickel (Ni), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), and copper (Cu)) in electroplating wastewater being discharged from large scale industrial units. The results showed that the concentration of heavy metals was found to be in the following order: Ni was 27.57 mg/L, Cr was 60.10 mg/L, Cu was 0.80 mg/L, and Cd was below the detectable limit (BDL). Furthermore, the treatment efficiency for Ni containing electroplating wastewater was comparatively evaluated through ozone oxidation and physicochemical process (coagulation and flocculation). The wastewater treated with ozone showed effective results for up to 30–40 min and achieved 42% Ni and 26% Cr removal efficiencies. In coagulation and flocculation, six beaker jar tests were conducted to remove Ni and Cr by using three different coagulants and non-ionic polyacrylamide. Among all these coagulants, aluminum sulfate was found more effective in combination with polymer. The optimum removal efficiency was achieved at 90 mg/L doses of aluminum sulfate and 100 mg/L of polymer for 98% and 99% removal of Ni and Cr, respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that the physiochemical processes (coagulation and flocculation) were the most efficient method as compared to ozone treatment.
engineering, chemical,water resources
What problem does this paper attempt to address?