Abstract:The mathematics problem solving approaches of a group of elementary and secondary ESL students were investigated through a performance assessment accompanied by think-aloud procedures. Students were enrolled in ESL mathematics classes in a Title VII project implementing the Cognitive Academic Learning Approach (CALLA). In this approach, curriculum content is used to develop academic language and learning strategies are taught explicitly to increase students' metacognitive awareness and to facilitate their learning of both content and language. Participating teachers were identified either as high implementation teachers (extensive involvement in staff development and other project activities) or low implementation teachers (limited involvement in project activities). The study was designed to identify learning and problem solving strategies of students at high, average and low mathematics achievement levels, and to compare strategic approaches of students in high implementation and low implementation classrooms. The results indicated that significantly more students in high implementation classrooms were able to solve the problem correctly than were students in low implementation classrooms. As expected, students rated high in math performance also performed significantly better on finding the correct problem solution. Of greater interest was the finding that there were no differences in the actual number of problem solving steps used by students in the two implementation levels, but that significant differences for high implementation classrooms were found for correct sequence of problem solving steps, which has been featured in instruction in the high implementation classrooms. This seemed to indicate that explicit instruction in a problem solving sequential procedure is helpful for ESL students. In addition, students in high implementation classrooms used significandy more metacognitive strategies than students in low implementation classrooms. High math ability students used the most metacognitive strategies in all types of classrooms. with average math ability students using fewer metacognitive strategies and low math ability students using the fewest metacognitive strategies. This finding seemed to indicate that students who were the highest achievers in mathematics and who received information about and practice in metacognitive strategies (such as planning, monitoring, and evaluating one's own learning) were better able to regulate their learning than less able math students or students in low implementation classrooms. Problems identified in the study were that even in high implementation classrooms, lower achieving students did not use the correct sequence of problem solving steps. Reasons could be attributed to differences in mathematics ability, differences in linguistic competence (since the task involved reading and understand a word problem), and/or amount of prior knowledge about learning and problem solving strategies. More research is needed to clarify these and other problems related to mathematics achievement of ESL students.

Using the Four Stages of Learning to Assess, Set Goals, and Instruct

Learning the Learning Stages: An Examination of an Online Module for Training Pre-service Teachers

A pedagogical model for STEAM education

Teaching self-regulated learning strategies to low-achieving fourth-grade students to enhance their perseverance in mathematical problem solving

ASK-IT/A2L: Assessing student knowlede with instructional technology

Examining instructional change at scale using data from diagnostic assessments built on learning trajectories

Formative Assessment Strategies by Monitoring Science Students’ Problem-Solving Skill Development

Coach learning to help teachers learn to enact conceptually rich, student-focused mathematics lessons

Mathematics instruction for elementary students with learning disabilities

"I Met My Goal!": The Use of Self-Regulated Learning with Students Receiving Tier 3 Instruction in Reading

Learning and Problem Solving Strategies of ESL Students

Application of the Team-Assisted Individualization Learning Model to Improve Students' Critical Thinking Skills in Mathematics in Fourth Grade Elementary Schools

Teachers' Use of Learning Progression-Based Formative Assessment to Inform Teachers' Instructional Adjustment: a Case Study of Two Physics Teachers' Instruction

AN APPROACH TO THE DEFINITION OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES IN SCHOOL MATHEMATICS

Teaching practices for differentiating mathematics instruction for middle school students

Teaching the Conceptual Structure of Mathematics

Preparing Elementary School Teachers to Learn From Teaching: A Comparison of Two Approaches to Mathematics Methods Instruction

Design Principles That Support Course Design Innovation for Elementary Mathematics Methods Courses

Toward A Framework for Formative Assessment of Conceptual Learning in K-12 Computer Science Classrooms

Educational Needs Assessment, Development of Learning Objectives, and Choosing a Teaching Approach