Different ways to implement innovative teaching approaches at scale
Katja Maass,Paul Cobb,Konrad Krainer,Despina Potari
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09920-8
2019-11-01
Educational Studies in Mathematics
Abstract:Research and experience reveal that innovative teaching approaches promoted by mathematics education researchers differ significantly from the day-to-day practices of teachers in many countries (Van den Akker, Gravemeijer, McKeeney, & Nieveen, <span class="CitationRef"><a href="#CR64">2006</a></span>; Boaler, <span class="CitationRef"><a href="#CR7">2008</a></span>; Burkhardt & Schoenfeld, <span class="CitationRef"><a href="#CR9">2003</a></span>; Krainer, <span class="CitationRef"><a href="#CR31">2011</a></span>; Burkhardt, <span class="CitationRef"><a href="#CR8">2018</a></span>; Cobb & Jackson, <span class="CitationRef"><a href="#CR11">2015</a></span>). As Boaler (<span class="CitationRef"><a href="#CR7">2008</a></span>) puts it: "An elusive and persistent gulf exists between research in mathematics education and the practices of mathematics classrooms, in many countries in the world." (p. 91) This clearly implies that research on implementing teaching approaches effectively is essential if this gulf is to be bridged. These investigations of scaling up should be broad in scope and attend not only to the practices of teachers and researchers, but also to the practices of other important stakeholders including school principals, teacher educators, educational administrators, and policymakers. Furthermore, because teaching contexts differ significantly both within and between regions and countries, it will be important to understand how innovative teaching approaches can be adapted to the local conditions of implementation while preserving their underlying core principles.
education & educational research