Phenotypic profile and antibiogram of biofilm-producing bacteria isolates from diabetic foot ulcers in Zaria, Nigeria

Yahaya Usman,Adamu Girei Bakari,Idris Nasir Abdullahi,Abdurrahman El-Fulaty Ahmad,Fatima Sani-Bello,Atiene Solomon Sagay,Adebola Tolulope Olayinka,AdamuGirei Bakari,IdrisNasir Abdullahi,AbdurrahmanEl-Fulaty Ahmad,AtieneSolomon Sagay,AdebolaTolulope Olayinka
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_552_21
2021-01-01
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) present with high morbidity and reduce patient's quality of life. There is a gross paucity of data on biofilm-producing bacteria in DFU Infection in North-Western Nigeria. The study sought to determine the biofilm-forming ability of bacteria isolates from DFUs and determine their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern in Zaria, North-Western Nigeria.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This hospital-based cross-sectional study of patients with DFUs was conducted from June 2018 to February 2020. Consecutive biopsies were aseptically collected. Bacteria were isolated and identified using a Microgen kit. Biofilm forming ability and antibiogram of isolates were determined using microtitre plate and disk diffusion methods, respectively.RESULTS: Of the 225 participants enrolled, males constituted the majority, 144 (64.0%) with 88 (36.0%) females, the median age of participants was 54 (48-60) years, and the age range was 36-77 years. A total of 172 bacteria were isolated, and 123 (71.5%) were biofilm producers. Staphylococcus aureus (26.7%) was the highest biofilm producer, while Citrobacter freundii and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were the least biofilm producers, 1 (0.6%) each. A disproportionate resistance pattern was demonstrated among the biofilm and non-biofilm producers against the cephalosporins tested, ceftazidime (68% vs. 18%), ceftriaxone (50% vs. 8.0%) and cefotaxime (21% vs. 0.0%). About 46% and 68% of the biofilm producers were resistant to gentamycin and ciprofloxacin, respectively. While only 2% of the non-biofilm producers were resistant to imipenem, 11% of the biofilm producers were resistant to it.CONCLUSION: These findings revealed a high proportion of biofilm-producing bacteria and were more resistant than non-biofilm producers.
English Else
What problem does this paper attempt to address?