The structure of a disaccharide liberated by lysozyme from the cell walls of Micrococcus lysodeikticus.

H. Perkins
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ0740182
IF: 3.766
Biochemical Journal
Abstract:Bacterium 11 differs from Bacteroides amylogens (Doetsch et al. 1957) in some of its fermentation reactions, and the fact that it does not form an iodophilic polysaccharide excludes it from classification with this organism. Bryant and his coworkers have described a number of Gramnegative rod-like bacteria isolated from bovinerumen contents, and bacterium 11 could be classified as a strain of Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens (Bryant & Small, 1956a). The fact that it rapidly ferments xylan precludes it from inclusion with the species Succinivibrio dextrinsolvens (Bryant & Small, 1956b) and Bacteroides succinogenes (Hungate, 1950), and suggests its inclusion with Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens. Although the type species of B. fibrisolvens was motile, it was suggested that the 'less actively cellulolytic rod' of Hungate was a Butyrivibrio species and this was non-motile (Bryant & Small, 1956a). The fermentation reactions of B. fibrisolvens strains are variable, but are generally similar to those of bacterium 11, and all are non-iodophilic. Bacterium 11 differs from Bacteroides amylogenes in the products of fermentation of xylose, especially in the formation of lactic acid. However, a lactic acid fermentation of xylose is known, for instance with Lactobacillus pentosus (Gest & Lampen, 1952). Although lactic acid is not a final product of the fermentation of xylose by mixed rumen organisms (Doetsch, Robinson, Brown & Shaw, 1953), the work of Pazur, Shuey & Georgi (1958) suggests that it might be an intermediate product.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?