Acceptable noise levels with intelligible and unintelligible primary discourse

Susan G. Hickey,Robert E. Moore
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4786419
2006-05-01
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Abstract:Acceptable noise levels (ANL) were assessed for 30 adult, normal-hearing listeners in sound field in three conditions. The three conditions were primary signal of (1) intelligible discourse (Arizona Travelogue); (2) unintelligible backwards discourse (Arizona Travelogue recorded backwards); and (3) unintelligible Chinese discourse. In each condition the primary speaker was male. ANL was determined for each of three conditions by having participants select their most comfortable level (MCL) for the primary discourse. Next, for each condition, speech babble was added and adjusted to find the participant’s maximum background noise level (BNL) that was acceptable while listening to the primary discourse. The ANL was determined by subtracting the BNL from the MCL. The group mean ANLs for the intelligible discourse, the backwards discourse, and the Chinese discourse were 7.16, 8.64, and 9.31 dB, respectively. An ANOVA for repeated measures indicated a significant main effect for primary discourse type (F=5.54, p=0.006). Posthoc paired samples t-tests indicated a significant difference between the intelligible and unintelligible backwards discourse condition (t=−2.47, p=0.020) and the intelligible and unintelligible Chinese discourse condition (t=−3.17, p=0.004).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?