Abstract:In our everyday lives, we need to process auditory and visual temporal information as efficiently as possible. Although automatic auditory time perception has been widely investigated using an index of the mismatch negativity (MMN), the neural basis of automatic visual time perception has been largely ignored. The present study investigated the automatic processing of auditory and visual time perception employing the cross-modal delayed response oddball paradigm. In the experimental condition, the standard stimulus was 200ms and the deviant stimulus was 120ms, which were exchanged in the control condition. Reaction time, accuracy, and event-related potential (ERP) data were measured when participants performed the duration discrimination task. The ERP results showed that the MMN, N2b, and P3 were elicited by an auditory deviant stimulus under the attention condition, while only the MMN was elicited under the inattention condition. The MMN was largest over the frontal and central sites, while the difference in MMN amplitude was not significant between under the attention and inattention condition. In contrast, the change-related positivity (CRP) and the visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) were elicited by the visual deviant stimulus under both the attention and inattention conditions. The CRP was largest over the occipito-temporal sites under the attention condition and over the fronto-central sites under the inattention condition. The difference in CRP amplitude was significant between the attention and inattention condition. The vMMN was largest over the parieto-occipital sites under the attention condition, and largest over the fronto-central sites under the inattention condition. The difference in vMMN amplitude was significant between the attention and inattention condition. Auditory MMN does not appear to be modulated by attention, whereas the visual CRP and the vMMN are modulated by attention. Therefore, the present study provides electrophysiological evidence for the existence of automatic visual time perception and supports an “attentional switch” hypothesis for a modality effect on duration judgments, such that auditory temporal information is processed relatively automatically, whereas visual temporal information processing requires controlled attention.

When long appears short: Effects of auditory distraction on event‐related potential correlates of time perception

Auditory distraction, time perception, and the role of age: ERP evidence from a large cohort study

The role of auditory transient and deviance processing in distraction of task performance: a combined behavioral and event-related brain potential study

Auditory context-dependent distraction by unexpected visual stimuli

Differences in the Neural Basis of Automatic Auditory and Visual Time Perception: ERP Evidence from an Across-Modal Delayed Response Oddball Task

Effects of auditory and tactile distraction in adults with low and high ADHD symptoms

Distraction by deviant sounds during reading: An eye-movement study

5:30 PM REWARD PROCESSING IN UNAFFECTED SIBLINGS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA PATIENTS: AN FMRI STUDY

Effects of attention on the processing of physical and abstract auditory regularities: An exploratory MMN study

The Effect of Visuospatial Attentional Load on the Processing of Irrelevant Acoustic Distractors

The Attention Modulation on Timing: an Event-Related Potential Study

Auditory distraction during reading: Investigating the effects of background sounds on parafoveal processing

A modified oddball paradigm “cross-modal delayed response” and the research on mismatch negativity

Attentional control and metacognitive monitoring of the effects of different types of task-irrelevant sound on serial recall.

Expected events dilate subjective duration in the auditory modality: Effects of predictability and expectation on time perception.

Testing stimulus exposure time as the critical factor of increased EPN and LPP amplitudes for fearful faces during perceptual distraction tasks

Distraction by Auditory Categorical Deviations Is Unrelated to Working Memory Capacity: Further Evidence of a Distinction between Acoustic and Categorical Deviation Effects

Congenitally blind humans use different stimulus selection strategies in hearing: An ERP study of spatial and temporal attention

Processing of complex distracting sounds in school-aged children and adults: evidence from EEG and MEG data

The effect of different negative emotional context on involuntary attention: an ERP study.

Distraction by auditory novelty during reading: Evidence for disruption in saccade planning, but not saccade execution