Turbulent wake of two non-identical-height tandem cantilevered prims: Sheltering effect
F. Freidooni,A. Sohankar,M.R. Rastan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117749
IF: 5
2024-04-19
Ocean Engineering
Abstract:The present work studies the flow sheltering effect over two tandem non-identical-height wall-mounted square cylinders (buildings-like structures with aspect ratios of AR=4 and 7) via Large Eddy Simulation (LES) at Reynolds number ( Re=ρUDμ ) 2.2×104 . The gap and wake flow dependencies on two opposite flow directions, where the oncoming flow first reaches the shorter cylinder for Geo.1 (at wind angle of 0°) and vice versa for Geo.2 (at wind angle of 180°), are examined for the scaled gap spacings ( G*=G/D ) of G*=1,3,5 at different heights of the prisms ( z*=zD=1.0,2.0,3.5,5.0,6,5 ). It is found that the sheltering effect is contingent on inflow direction and G *, and determines the presence or absence of seven identified flow regimes, named slender-body, alternate reattachment, semi-stable gap, co-shedding, solo-shedding, and symmetric shedding. Then, the correlation of the sheltering effect and the flow topology, and subsequently, the wall pressure distribution, aerodynamic forces, and vortex shedding are discussed. The paper further comments on the practicalities associated with urban aerodynamics, i.e., pedestrian-level wind conditions, and aerodynamics interfering factor ( AIF ). It is found that the pressure distribution on the cylinders' walls is strongly dependent on the gap flow structures and the inflow direction for both configurations (Geo.1 and Geo.2). Therefore, the mean drag, lift, and drag force fluctuations and aerodynamic interference factor ( AIF ) of these forces are dependent on G* , increasing with an increase of G* . Regardless of the inlet flow direction and G* , the minimum gap spacing to provide suitable aerodynamic comfort in the wake and the gap on the pedestrian level is G*=3 .
engineering, civil, ocean, marine,oceanography