Abstract:While there is conclusive research that female political candidates are treated unfairly by traditional media outlets, the volume and pace of information flow online make it difficult to track the differentiated treatment for female candidates on social media in real time. This paper leverages human coding and natural language processing to cluster tweets into narratives concerned with policy, ideology, character, identity, and electability, focusing on the Democratic candidates in the 2020 U.S. Presidential primary election. We find that female candidates are frequently marginalized and attacked on character and identity issues that are not raised for their male counterparts, echoing the problems found in the traditional media in the framing of female candidates. Our research found a Catch-22 for female candidates, in that they either failed to garner serious attention at all or, if they became a subject of Twitter commentary, were attacked on issues of character and identity that were not raised for their male counterparts. At the same time, women running for president received significantly more negative tweets from right-leaning and non-credible sources than did male candidates. Following the first Democratic debates, the individual differences between male and female candidates became even more pronounced, although at least one female candidate (Elizabeth Warren) seemed to rise above the character attacks by the end of the first debates. We propose that by using artificial intelligence informed by traditional political communication theory, we can much more readily identify and challenge both sexist comments and coverage at scale. We use the concept of narratives by searching for political communication narratives about female candidates that are visible, enduring, resonant, and relevant to particular campaign messages. A real-time measurement system, developed by MarvelousAI, creates a way to allow candidates to identify and push back against sexist framing on social media and take control of their own narratives much more readily.

He Votes or She Votes? Female and Male Discursive Strategies in Twitter Political Hashtags

Gendered Tweets: Computational Text Analysis of Gender Differences in Political Discussion on Twitter

Gender identity and lexical variation in social media

Gender differences in online communication: A case study of Soccer

Is Japanese gendered language used on Twitter ? A large scale study

2020 U.S. presidential election in swing states: Gender differences in Twitter conversations

Running While Female: Using AI to Track how Twitter Commentary Disadvantages Women in the 2020 U.S. Primaries

Characterizing Interconnections and Linguistic Patterns in Twitter

When the Personal Becomes Political: Unpacking the Dynamics of Sexual Violence and Gender Justice Discourses Across Four Social Media Platforms

Constructing counter-hegemony on Twitter: Discourse of Ibero-American political women of “change” in the digital environment

What are Your Pronouns? Examining Gender Pronoun Usage on Twitter

Persuasion or Insulting? Unpacking Discursive Strategies of Gender Debate in Everyday Feminism in China

Linguistic Diversities of Demographic Groups in Twitter

Gender Asymmetries in Reality and Fiction: The Bechdel Test of Social Media

Online Misogyny Against Female Candidates in the 2022 Brazilian Elections: A Threat to Women's Political Representation?

Exploration of Gender Differences in COVID-19 Discourse on Reddit

Uncovering Gender Bias within Journalist-Politician Interaction in Indian Twitter

Women, politics and Twitter: Using machine learning to change the discourse

Using Sociolinguistic Variables to Reveal Changing Attitudes Towards Sexuality and Gender

Discourse Networks and Dual Screening: Analyzing Roles, Content and Motivations in Political Twitter Conversations

Linguistic Analysis: Representation of Women in the Discourse of Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates in Political News