Gender differences in online communication: A case study of Soccer

Mariana Macedo,Akrati Saxena
2024-03-17
Abstract:Social media and digital platforms allow us to express our opinions freely and easily to a vast number of people. In this study, we examine whether there are gender-based differences in how communication happens via Twitter in regard to soccer. Soccer is one of the most popular sports, and therefore, on social media, it engages a diverse audience regardless of their technical knowledge. We collected Twitter data for three months (March-June) for English and Portuguese that contains 9.5 million Tweets related to soccer, and only 18.38% tweets were identified as belonging to women, highlighting a possible gender gap already in the number of people who participated actively in this topic. We then conduct a fine-grained text-level and network-level analysis to identify the gender differences that might exist while communicating on Twitter. Our results show that women express their emotions more intensely than men, regardless of the differences in volume. The network generated from Portuguese has lower homophily than English. However, this difference in homophily does not impact how females express their emotions and sentiments, suggesting that these aspects are inherent norms or characteristics of genders. Our study unveils more gaps through qualitative and quantitative analyses, highlighting the importance of examining and reporting gender gaps in online communication to create a more inclusive space where people can openly share their opinions.
Social and Information Networks
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper mainly discusses the issue of gender differences in online communication, particularly in football-related Twitter data. The study found that although women have a lower participation rate in football topics (only 18.38%), they express emotions more strongly, regardless of the difference in quantity. The homogeneity of the Portuguese language network is lower than that of the English network, but this does not affect the way women express emotions. The study revealed gender differences through text-level and network-level analyses, including women's tendency to use words that express strong emotions, while men tend to use more neutral words. In addition, network structure analysis showed that men are more likely to occupy central positions in the network, while women are more engaged in self-interaction, such as retweeting and replying to their own content. The paper points out that there is a phenomenon of male dominance on social media, which may make women feel uncomfortable and affect their participation in certain topics such as sports. The study emphasizes the importance of identifying and reporting gender gaps in online communication to promote a more inclusive environment. Finally, the authors suggest encouraging participation of all individuals through intervention measures to reduce gender gaps, especially in fields like football.