A novel four phase slug single-well push-pull test with regional flux:forward modeling and parameter estimation
Aohan Jin,Quanrong Wang,Hongbin Zhan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130705
IF: 6.4
2024-01-25
Journal of Hydrology
Abstract:The single-well push-pull (SWPP) test has been widely used for several applications, including determination of transport parameters such as regional groundwater flux velocity, effective porosity and dispersivity. A complete SWPP test usually includes four phases of injection, chase, rest, and extraction, while previous models mostly ignore the chase phase for the sake of simplification. Actually, the chase phase is important to minimize the impact of well skins and wellbore storage on the shape of the breakthrough curves (BTCs), thus is necessary and should be included in the model. To this end, two simplified methods are proposed in this study based on two different time tp and ta during a four-phase SWPP test to estimate the parameters related to transport, where tp and ta correspond to the time of the peak concentration during the injection phase and the time when the center of tracer mass returns to the wellbore during the extraction phase, respectively. Specifically, the tp method can be used to estimate the regional groundwater flow velocity and dispersivity (transverse and longitudinal), while the ta method is used to estimate the regional groundwater flow velocity and the effective porosity. Finite-element numerical modeling of the SWPP test based on the coupling of two-dimensional transient groundwater flow and solute transport is employed to test the applicability of the proposed methods. Results indicate that both the tp and ta methods proposed in this study perform satisfactorily in estimation of regional groundwater flow velocity, effective porosity and dispersivity, and these two methods require fewer observations than traditional curve fitting methods and do not require any optimization algorithms. We have also compared the proposed two methods with several previous methods, and conclude that these two new methods generally perform better than those of previous studies in terms of parameter estimation reliability.
geosciences, multidisciplinary,water resources,engineering, civil