Abstract:Experimentation has been extended to almost every subfield of economics,including microeconomics and macroeconomics.Since the 1980s,economists have come to increasingly rely on experiments to explain and predict economic phenomenon.However,it takes mainstream economists dozens of years to turn their attitude from questioning and rejecting to accepting and supporting.This was partly due to the great efforts exerted by experimental pioneers,but more important was a result of the paradigm shift that occurred in economics in 1980s when the dominant position of General Equilibrium Theory was challenged by alternative theories such as Game Theory,Industrial Organization,and Public Choices,etc. Nevertheless,many critics are calling into question the artefact,reality,validity,especially external validity of laboratory experiments.Lab experiments,indeed,are not the solution to every question,especially those questions that involve interactions among hundreds of thousands of people or involve context-dependent variables that could not be randomized.But there are many types of questions and theories that are not specific to a group of people or a place or a context.Lab experiments are an excellent tool for these questions.It's noteworthy that the uprising of field experiments in the last decades has offset the weakness of lab experiments to a large extent.When feasible,the natural field experiment is an ideal kind of experiment that combines the advantages of both lab experiments and natural experiments because the subjects do not know that they are participating in an experiment.Experimental economics is developing quickly.However,it is not driven by criticisms and pressure from outside,but largely by the interaction of experiment and theory from inside,especially from the interdisciplinary interaction between the sister subfields of experimental economics and behavioral economics.Although they have different emphases,the divide between them is increasingly narrowed.Experimental economists and behavioral economics(and psychologists) are recently increasingly interested in thinking about the same kind of questions.Indeed,some researchers would find it difficult to classify themselves into one group or the other.They start to learn from each other and employ the cumulative knowledge of both subfields in their research.The emergence of Neuro-economics is a typical example.Neuro-economics is an area that bridges the fields of psychology,economics and neuro-science.It is question and interest,not method,that direct the development of this subject. Experimental Economics could certainly play an important role in the development of China,both in theory and practice.This is not only reflected in the commonplaces of experimental economics,namely,testing theory,searching for rule,and whistling besides the ears of princes,but also in the sense that it provides a good opportunity for us to develop theories and to design mechanisms that are context-dependent by solid empirical study.

Shaping Social Work Science

Shaping a Science of Social Work

The Rising and Challenge of Experimental Economics

The Methodological Foundation of Experiments in Economics:Beyond "Innocuous Falsificationism"

Factors Which Have an Impact on the Innovation of Social Science Research Methods and Their Mechanism

Making Quantitative Research Work: From Positivist Dogma to Actual Social Scientific Inquiry

When Methods Meet Motives: methodological pluralism in Social Work research

The influence of philosophy of science on methodology of economics

Reflections on Econometric Modeling Methodology

A Theoretical Study of Modelling and Simulation in Mathematical Sociology: Future Directions and Challenges

Data, measurement and empirical methods in the science of science

Science of science: A multidisciplinary field studying science

On Some Issues of Method on Quantitative Empirical Analysis

Modeling the social organization of science

On the Definition and the Technologic Requirement of Research Methodology of Economic Thought History

Representative Methods of Computational Socioeconomics

Shared Challenges and Solutions: the Common Future of Comparative Politics and Quantitative Methodology

Scientometrics and Science Studies: From Words and Co-Words to Information and Probabilistic Entropy

The Three Logics of Qualitative Research: Epistemology, Ontology, and Methodology in Political Science

Quantification in Experimental Psychology and Pragmatic Epistemology: Tension Between the Scientific Imperative and the Social Imperative

Epistemology and social work: enhancing the integration of theory, practice and research through philosophical pragmatism