Abstract:<p>Institutional donors occupy a privileged position among nongovernmental organization (NGO) stakeholders, which enables them to satisfy their accountability demands via donor‐imposed reporting in addition to official NGO information disclosures. This study explores the rationale behind the accountability demands of institutional donors and the utilization of donor‐imposed reporting for building, keeping, and strengthening NGO–donor relationships by examining a case of a Norwegian advocacy NGO and its five institutional donors. Real‐life constructs embedded in interview design are employed to contextualize the accounting data and expand the respondents' perceptions by providing visibility to alternative scenarios of information provision. By approaching the topic through multi‐organizational perspectives, the study reveals the confluence and interdependence in symbiotic relationships of NGOs and their long‐term institutional donors, which are built through regular interorganizational interactions around imposed accountability demands and reporting requirements. The findings demonstrate that donors' accountability demands are motivated by their vested interests in controlling, mitigating risk, legitimating grants' provision, influencing NGO agendas, and obtaining trustworthy partners in the nonprofit sector. The analysis reveals that the types of demands donors impose are determined by institutional logics embedded in their own organisational practices, ideologies, and patterns of governance. The multiplicity of implied donor logics requires NGOs to adjust their identities as the notions of familiarity, compliance, and consonance with these logics would signal NGOs' trustworthiness and reliability and assist in securitization of long‐term funding. Finally, the study discusses the implications of the multiplicity of donors' logics and imposed requirements for the accountability and reporting practices in the nonprofit sector.</p>

Building Blocks of Individual Biography? Non-Governmental Organizational Communication in Reflexive Modernity

Rhetorical Framing of Organizational Identity: Corporate Social Responsibility in the Modern World Polity

Muting or Meddling? Advocacy as a Relational Communication Strategy Affecting Organization–Public Relationships and Stakeholder Response

Investigating Membership Retention: Employing Public Relations Theory to Better Understand Relationship Management

Organized Persuasive Communication: A new conceptual framework for research on public relations, propaganda and promotional culture

From Motivation to Organizational Identity of Members in Non-profit Organizations: The Role of Collectivism

Strengthening the Tie: Creating Exchange Relationships That Encourage Employee Advocacy as an Organizational Citizenship Behavior

Crafting Moral Infrastructures: How Nonprofits Use Facebook to Survive

Narrative fidelity to the Little Red Book in the framing efforts of the Red Guard Movement: A theoretical model for foundational documents

Communication and Organizational Culture

Elite Communication and the Popular Legitimacy of International Organizations

Rethinking digital activism

Moral Foundations of Legal Communication

Public Legitimation by “Going Personal”? The Ambiguous Role of International Organization Officials on Social Media

An Analysis of the Policy Advocacy of Korean Civil Society in International Development Cooperation: Focusing on Resource Mobilization and Constructivism Frame Theory

A new culture of advocacy: An exploratory analysis of social activism on the web and social media

THE ROLE OF ETHICAL LEADERSHIP AND WHISTLEBLOWING INTENTIONS: MEDIATING APPARATUS OF MORAL IDENTITY

Social Construction of Organization. A New model in Organizational Development

Identity Under Construction: How Individuals Come to Define Themselves in Organizations

The multiplicity of logics, trust, and interdependence in donor‐imposed reporting practices in the nonprofit sector

The social origins and uses of media and communication research