Abstract:Since the 1990s financial economists have documented the essential role of creditors' rights in encouraging lenders to provide credit. This article demonstrates the central importance of creditors' ability to use movable assets such as inventories and accounts receivable (as distinct from immovable assets like real estate) as collateral when lending to business enterpriseses. Using a unique cross‐country, micro‐level loan data set that contains loan‐to‐value ratios for different assets, the authors found that the loan‐to‐values of loans that are collateralized with movable assets were lower in countries with weak collateral laws for movable assets, and that lending in such countries was biased toward the use of immovable assets. Using sector‐level data, the authors also found that weak movable collateral laws were associated with distortions in the allocation of resources that favored immovable‐based production and investment. The effects of resources that favored immovable‐based production and investment. The effects of the collateral law reform enacted in Slovakia in 2003 were held up as providing support for the authors' findings. The authors also investigated which aspects of movable assets collateralization regimes are most important for facilitating the use of movable assets as collateral. They concluded that the two critical features of such regimes are the registration of collateral interests—which facilitates monitoring of collateral and avoids double pledging—and the ability of creditors to avoid lengthy court proceedings when taking possession of collateral. These findings suggest that it would be relatively easy for many countries to increase their supply of credit because reforming these aspects of legal regimes is fairly straightforward with few political obstacles.

Creditor Rights and Innovation: Evidence from Patent Collateral

Patent Collateral, Investor Commitment and the Market for Venture Lending

Firm Innovation and Covenant Tightness

Do Stronger Patents Stimulate or Stifle Innovation? the Crucial Role of Financial Development

Patent collateral and the trajectory of innovation

Patent Pledgeability and Corporate Innovation

Do patent pledges accelerate innovation?

Innovation under debtor-friendly institutional policy: Strategic patenting perspective of Chinese listed firms

Leveraging Intellectual Property: The Value of Harmonized Enforcement Regimes

Which Creditors’ Rights Drive Financial Deepening and Economic Development?

WHO PROFITS FROM PATENTS? RENT-SHARING AT INNOVATIVE FIRMS

Patent pledgeability, trade secrecy, and corporate patenting

Financial Innovation in the Twenty-First Century: Evidence from US Patents

PATENTABILITY, R&D DIRECTION, AND CUMULATIVE INNOVATION

Creditor Interventions and Firm Innovation : Evidence from Debt Covenant Violations

Financial Innovation in the 21st Century: Evidence from U.S. Patents

Institutional Dual Holdings and Risk Shifting: Evidence from Corporate Innovation

Capital control, debt financing and innovative activity

Does Property Rights Protection Affect Firm Innovation? Evidence from the Chinese Property Rights Law Enactment

Status Preference And The Effects Of Patent Protection: Theory And Evidence

Short Sellers and Innovation: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment