Abstract:Since the 1990s financial economists have documented the essential role of creditors' rights in encouraging lenders to provide credit. This article demonstrates the central importance of creditors' ability to use movable assets such as inventories and accounts receivable (as distinct from immovable assets like real estate) as collateral when lending to business enterpriseses. Using a unique cross‐country, micro‐level loan data set that contains loan‐to‐value ratios for different assets, the authors found that the loan‐to‐values of loans that are collateralized with movable assets were lower in countries with weak collateral laws for movable assets, and that lending in such countries was biased toward the use of immovable assets. Using sector‐level data, the authors also found that weak movable collateral laws were associated with distortions in the allocation of resources that favored immovable‐based production and investment. The effects of resources that favored immovable‐based production and investment. The effects of the collateral law reform enacted in Slovakia in 2003 were held up as providing support for the authors' findings. The authors also investigated which aspects of movable assets collateralization regimes are most important for facilitating the use of movable assets as collateral. They concluded that the two critical features of such regimes are the registration of collateral interests—which facilitates monitoring of collateral and avoids double pledging—and the ability of creditors to avoid lengthy court proceedings when taking possession of collateral. These findings suggest that it would be relatively easy for many countries to increase their supply of credit because reforming these aspects of legal regimes is fairly straightforward with few political obstacles.

Leveraging Intellectual Property: The Value of Harmonized Enforcement Regimes

Innovation under debtor-friendly institutional policy: Strategic patenting perspective of Chinese listed firms

Creditor Rights and Innovation: Evidence from Patent Collateral

Innovation and Appropriability: Revisiting the Role of Intellectual Property

Do Stronger Patents Stimulate or Stifle Innovation? the Crucial Role of Financial Development

Intellectual Property Pledge Financing and Enterprise Innovation: Based on the Perspective of Signal Incentive

Does Property Rights Protection Affect Firm Innovation? Evidence from the Chinese Property Rights Law Enactment

Insight into the nexus between intellectual property pledge financing and enterprise innovation: A systematic analysis with multidimensional perspectives

Intellectual Property Protection and Financial Markets: Patenting vs. Secrecy

Intellectual property protection, infringement disputes, and, corporate innovation investment persistence

Debt of Bank, Institutional Environment and the Agent Cost of Controlling Shareholder

Intellectual Property and Economic Development: Catalysts for Innovation and Growth

Pledge to green: the green innovation effect of intellectual property pledge financing pilot policy

Innovation Economics Approach to Intellectual Property Law Scholarship

Intellectual Property Protection, Financial Innovation and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China

Do patent pledges accelerate innovation?

Which Creditors’ Rights Drive Financial Deepening and Economic Development?

Intellectual property protection mechanisms and the characteristics of founding teams

The Effect of Property Rights Protection on Capital Structure: Evidence from a Chinese Natural Experiment

Patent collateral and the trajectory of innovation

Towards integrating country- and firm-level perspectives on intellectual property rights