Abstract:Introduction The quick aphasia battery (QAB), which assesses all areas of language in detail and quickly, was developed in English. It has been shown to be suitable for bedside patients. There is a need for a Turkish bedside test that allows for a comprehensive yet rapid assessment of stroke patients in terms of aphasia. The aim of this study was to create a Turkish version of QAB (QAB‐TR) and to determine its validity and reliability in Turkish‐speaking patients after a stroke. Materials and methods The study was conducted with 188 people aged 41–88 years. Of these, 37 (19.7%) had aphasia (12 chronic, 25 acute), 53 (28.2%) were acute stroke patients without aphasia, and 98 (52.1%) were healthy controls. Internal consistency and criterion validity, test–retest reliability, and inter‐rater reliability of the QAB‐TR were performed. The language assessment test for aphasia was used for criterion validity. For the inter‐rater reliability of the test, two different speech language therapists (SLP) administered the QAB‐TR. For test–retest reliability, 2 weeks later, the same SLP who filled out the QAB‐TR the first time was administered the test again. To test the validity of the test, correlations between the items and subsections were determined. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to examine the sensitivity and selectivity of the QAB‐TR score, and a cut‐off value was determined to distinguish patients with aphasia. Results The inter‐rater Krippendorff's alpha value of the QAB‐TR total was 0.6754. There was no statistically significant difference (p > .05) between the first and second QAB‐TR total scores. The correlation analysis between the QAB‐TR subsection scores and the total QAB‐TR score (0.244–0.897) revealed statistically significant relationships. The area under the ROC curve was statistically significant and was found to be 0.853 (95% confidence interval: 0.799–0.906). The cut‐off point for the QAB score to discriminate between patients with aphasia and those without aphasia was found to be 8.825, with 0.767 sensitivity and 0.765 selectivity (1–0.235). Conclusion All the study results show that QAB‐TR has internal consistency, criterion validity, test–retest reliability, and inter‐rater reliability. It can be administered in as little as 15 min and provides information about the multidimensional linguistic profiles of individuals. QAB‐TR can be used for both clinical and study purposes as a language battery that allows for the measurement of the strengths and weaknesses of Turkish‐speaking individuals who have suffered a stroke in basic language areas in acute and chronic periods. It can be easily administered at the bedside for individuals who have just suffered an acute stroke and can facilitate early assessment of individuals in terms of aphasia and early initiation of therapy, if necessary.

The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the apraxia screen of TULIA in multiple sclerosis patients

Translation and Validation of the Arrhythmia-Specific Questionnaire in Tachycardia and Arrhythmia (ASTA) to the Brazilian Context: An Instrument Focusing on Arrhythmia Symptoms

Validation and reliability of the Munich Shoulder Questionnaire for Turkish patients with shoulder dysfunction

The Reliability and Validity of the Timed Up & Go Test and the 30-S Sit-To-Stand Test Performed via Tele-Assessment in Ambulatory Patients with Stroke

The agreement between face-to-face and tele-assessment of balance tests in patients with multiple sclerosis

Turkish validity and reliability study on the quick aphasia battery

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale on patients with knee injuries

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Prosthesis Embodiment Scale for Lower Limb Amputees

Psychometric properties and validation of the metacognitive self-assessment scale (MSAS) in a Turkish sample

Cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Turkish version of north star ambulatory assessment

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome Score

Turkish translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and assessment of psychometric properties of the Ottawa sitting scale for the intensive care unit survivors

Validity and reliability of the Six-Minute Pegboard Ring Test for assessing functional capacity and upper limb function in persons with multiple sclerosis

Validity and intra- and inter-rater reliability of the Tinetti performance-oriented mobility assessment balance subscale using different tele-assessment methods in patients with chronic stroke

Adaptation of Turkish version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome

THE CULTURAL ADAPTATION, RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE SIMPLE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY QUESTIONNAIRE IN COMMON MENTAL DISORDERS

Turkish translation and transcultural validity and reliability of an assessment tool for spasticity: Leg Activity Measure (Leg A)

Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Donor Site Morbidity Questionnaire Into Turkish

Translation and Adaptation of the Reinjury Anxiety Inventory, the Sport Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale, and the Athletic Injury Self-Efficacy Questionnaire Into Turkish

Validity and reliability of selective control of upper extremity scale (SCUES) in patients with chronic stroke

Investigation of the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Comprehensive Coordination Scale in patients with Parkinson's disease