Abstract:Background After stroke many patients remain with difficulties in using the upper limbs, balance, transfers, and walking. The Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) assess the movements needed to do those activities. Social restrictions to combat the Covid-19 pandemic have increased the telerehabilitation, but the remote assessment is also important for rural areas or geographic regions where neurorehabilitation specialists are scarce, and when patients have difficulties on transport to the clinic. Although the measurement properties of the MAS applied in person are established, the validity and reliability of the MAS applied via teleconsultation is unknown. Objectives To investigate the validity and reliability of the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) when administered remotely by videoconference (Tele-MAS). Methods This is a study of investigation of measurement properties, following the recommendations of COSMIN, for validity and reliability of Tele-MAS. The sample was 18 participants with a diagnosis of stroke, Braztel-MMSE score ≥13 points and with internet access and mobile device. The order of the evaluations (remote or in person) was randomly defined. The application sequence of the MAS items was adapted to allow remote application in addition to verbal commands during the evaluation and a specific instruction manual for application by videoconference was developed. For assessment by videoconference (rater A and B) the participant was instructed to position the camera in a way that the therapist can observe from the ground to above the head. The raters are positioned similarly to the participant to demonstrate the items and score synchronously. The application in person takes place in the participant's house, by rater A. The three collections took place within a period of eight days, with an interval of 2 days. The validity between the in person and remote evaluation was analyzed by Pearson's correlation coefficient and the reliability between the remote and in person evaluation was analyzed using the Bland-Altman limits of agreement. The interrater reliability for the sum of the score of the items was analyzed by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) with a confidence interval of 95% (95%CI). Data were analyzed using MedCalc software®. Results A strong positive correlation (r=0.96; 95%CI=0.90-0.99) was found between the MAS and Tele-MAS scores. The analysis of the Bland-Altman graph for the total MAS scores indicated that the mean difference between in person and remote scores was -0.6 points. The 95% limits of agreement are +6.5 and -7.6 points. Excellent interrater reliability (ICC≤0.94; 95%CI =0.84-0.98) of the total Tele-MAS score. Conclusion The preliminary results indicate that Tele-MAS should be considered as a valid measure and has interrater reliability. Implications MAS is widely used in clinical practice, however, the measurement properties of the remote version applied by videoconference were unknown. The results of the final study should present the validity and reliability of Tele-MAS to remotely assess post-stroke motor function through videoconference.

The Reliability and Validity of the Timed Up & Go Test and the 30-S Sit-To-Stand Test Performed via Tele-Assessment in Ambulatory Patients with Stroke

Intra- and inter- rater reliability of the face‐to‐face assessment and tele‐assessment of performance-based tests in older adults

Loaded and unloaded timed stair tests as tools for assessing advanced functional mobility in people with stroke

Validity and reliability of performance tests as balance measures in patients with total knee arthroplasty

Validity and intra- and inter-rater reliability of the Tinetti performance-oriented mobility assessment balance subscale using different tele-assessment methods in patients with chronic stroke

Virtual assessment protocols for Timed-Up-and-Go, 5-repetition Chair Rise, and 1-minute Sit-to-Stand tests in community-dwelling older adults: Investigating feasibility, reliability, and validity

Dual Tasking Affects the Outcomes of Instrumented Timed up and Go, Sit-to-Stand, Balance, and 10-Meter Walk Tests in Stroke Survivors

The agreement between face-to-face and tele-assessment of balance tests in patients with multiple sclerosis

The reliability and validity of the Timed Up and Go as a clinical tool in individuals with and without disabilities across a lifespan: a systematic review

Validity and reliability of the Six-Minute Pegboard Ring Test for assessing functional capacity and upper limb function in persons with multiple sclerosis

The Dubousset Functional Test: a reliable and valid test in early stage Parkinson’s disease patients

Reliability of the 50-foot walk test and 30-sec chair stand test in total knee arthroplasty

Teleassessment using five times sit-to-stand test in older adults with and without Parkinson's disease: Guidelines and barriers

Parallel-forms Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of the Four Telerehabilitation Version Mobility-related Function Scales in Stroke Survivors

Timed Up‐and‐Go Test and Sit‐to‐Stand Test in Community‐Dwelling Older Person: Inter and Intraobserver Reliability Among Turkish Nurses

30-Second Chair Stand and 5-Times Sit-to-Stand Tests Are Interesting Tools for Assessing Disability and Ability to Ambulate among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Evaluating the reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the performance-oriented mobility assessment among patients with chronic stroke

Clinical Measures of Balance and Walking Ability in People with Stroke for Assessment via Videoconferencing

Conventional video-based system for measuring the subtask speed of the Timed Up and Go Test in older adults: Validity and reliability study

VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE MOTOR ASSESSMENT SCALE FOR REMOTE ASSESSMENT OF INDIVIDUALS AFTER STROKE – PRELIMINARY RESULT

The Use of a Single-Time Sit-To-Stand Test in Ambulatory Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury by Primary Health Care Providers