Abstract:In scientific research collaboration, researchers collaborate with different scholars throughout their career stages. Researchers at different career stages may play various roles in science teams. This paper focuses only on the researchers' roles in their respective science teams, defined as "relative roles " here, rather than comparing roles among researchers. As the academic age of researchers is increasing, researchers formulate the positive (e.g., junior-peer-senior) or negative growth trajectories (e.g., peer-peer-junior) of the relative roles throughout their career stages, which are defined as the "relative role growth patterns ". Further, these growth patterns can be divided into different "relative role growth types " according to their several common characteristics. By constructing ego-centric networks of researchers based on academic age, this paper investigates the changing relative roles of researchers at different career stages and relative role growth types summarized from multiple growth patterns, and then analyzes the collaborative ability (i.e., collaboration frequencies and number of collaborators) and research performance under different growth types. In addition, we also discuss the influence of collaborators on the formation of relative role growth types. We find 13 relative role growth patterns and summarize them into four growth types. The four growth types have diverse collaborative ability and research performance. Different collaborators have different effects on the formation of growth types of researchers. Collaborators who have high productivity and high citations per paper have a positive influence on researchers' growth and vice versa. This study could be useful for researchers planning career development, also for policymakers and university administrators.

How are collaboration and productivity correlated at various career stages of scientists?

Collaboration Drives Individual Productivity

Higher-order structures of local collaboration networks are associated with individual scientific productivity

Scientific collaboration and career stages: An ego-centric perspective

Standing on the shoulders of giants: the effect of outstanding scientists on young collaborators’ careers

Does collaboration bring high-impact studies? A preliminary study.

Understanding scientific collaboration: Homophily, transitivity, and preferential attachment

Impactful scientists have higher tendency to involve collaborators in new topics

The Impact of a Researcher’s Structural Position on Scientific Performance: An Empirical Analysis

Understanding Persistent Scientific Collaboration

Untangling the Network Effects of Productivity and Prominence among Scientists

Dynamics of co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research

Funded Collaboration Research in Mathematics in China

Collaboration Signatures Reveal Scientific Impact

Toward scientific collaboration: A cost-benefit perspective

Scientific Collaboration Network Based on MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry

Understanding success through the diversity of collaborators and the milestone of career

Quantifying the impact of weak, strong, and super ties in scientific careers

How much do technical scientists really cooperate?

Quantifying team chemistry in scientific collaboration

The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants