Effectiveness of Simulation-Based Training of Undergraduate Medical Students Regarding the Management of Eclampsia: A Randomized Controlled Educational Trial
Mishu Mangla,Naina Kumar,Aparna Jarathi,Nabnita Patnaik,Lalita B Nimmala,Subhrajyoti Roy,Deepak Singla
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.58898
2024-04-24
Cureus
Abstract:Introduction Obstetric emergencies, like eclampsia, need a quick and accurate response from the treating physician coming into first contact with the patient. Therefore, all doctors, even primary care physicians, interns, and resident doctors, need training to handle such cases proficiently, leaving minimal chances of error. Providing training for the management of these critical conditions on actual patients is not practically feasible. Clinical simulation in obstetrics can be used for the improvement of these skills for undergraduate and postgraduate students. We conducted a non-blinded randomized controlled trial with the primary aim of developing and implementing a module for training undergraduate medical students on the assessment and management of eclampsia and to evaluate and compare it with traditional didactic lectures or case-based learning. Methods The present randomized controlled educational trial was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, India. The undergraduate medical students (Phase 3, Part 1) posted in the department during their clinical postings or tutorials were randomized into two groups. A total of 62 students were randomly divided into two groups, Group A and Group B, each consisting of 31 students. However, only 24/31 (77.42%) in Group A and 19/31 (61.3%) in Group B finally agreed to participate in the study. One group (Group A, with 24 participants) was taught the diagnosis and management of antepartum eclampsia through simulation-based training, and the other group (Group B, with 19 participants) was taught the same topic through conventional teaching, which consisted of didactic lectures through PowerPoint presentations and case-based discussion. Learning objectives were kept identical for both groups. Pre- and post-test scores were compared for both groups. Results The mean pre-test score of the simulation group was 6.13 ± 1.39, and that of the conventional teaching group was 6.05 ± 1.54. The post-test score of the simulation group was 9.17 ± 1.34, and that of the conventional teaching group was 7.37 ± 1.70. The simulation group showed an extremely significant (two-tailed p < 0.0001) improvement in their post-test scores when compared to their scores before the module was taught. The difference in the scores of simulated teaching (Group A) and conventional teaching (Group B) was also statistically significant (p = 0.005). Simulation-based learning was found to be more interactive, helpful in providing real-life-like experiences, led to better retention and understanding, and motivated the students for self-directed learning. Conclusion Although both conventional and simulation-based teaching were useful, simulation-based training was more effective in teaching undergraduate medical students regarding the diagnosis and management of eclampsia. Simulation-based learning is more interactive, provides real-life-like experiences, leads to better retention and understanding, and motivates the students for self-directed learning.