The International Dimensions of the Argentine Default: The Case of the Sovereign Debt Restructuring Mechanism

Susanne Soederberg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08263663.2003.10816837
2003-01-01
Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies
Abstract:Aside from representing the biggest default of its kind in history, the Argentine default in December 2001 triggered several important, albeit largely neglected, debates on how best to manage future sovereign bankruptcies. These debates centre on the key policy to emerge from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the so-called Sovereign Debt Restructuring Mechanism (SDRM). Despite the significance of the debates around this mechanism, particularly with respect to understanding Washington's position vis-à-vis providing new financing for Argentina, the literature on the SDRM continues to be dominated by economic analyses. As such, the SDRM has been discussed without consideration of either power relations or contradictions in the global political economy. By situating the key debates on the SDRM in this wider context, I suggest that the debates on the SDRM do little to promote economic stability and social justice in emerging market economies, like Argentina, but instead by reproducing the imperative of capital account liberalization, the SDRM increases the power of transnational capital over sovereign states.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?