Abstract:We assessed differential use of nest materials among birds at a site in Massachusetts, USA. Proportional masses of all material types differed among species. Our study supports the notion that birds using the same environment have distinct niches in relation to the materials placed in their nests. Differential use of resources among bird species has been examined extensively in diet and nesting sites, but few studies have assessed this regarding avian nest materials. We assessed the structure and composition of nests in a group of co‐existing passerine shrubland birds at a site in Massachusetts, USA. We found, measured, collected, and dissected nests, and then weighed nest materials in morphological groups (e.g., bark, twigs, feathers) to determine if our seven focal species were using different nest materials. Among species, we compared proportional material masses in complete nests, and also separately in the exterior, structural part of the nest and the interior, cup lining. We found that the proportional masses of all 17 material types that we examined in nests differed among species. The compositions of nests among all seven bird species were distinct in multivariate ordination space and only a few pairs of species had substantial niche overlap. Proportional masses of materials within discrete sections (exterior and interior) also varied among species. Although some differences in nest composition could be partially explained by bird species size, nest materials differed even within the three larger bodied species and within four smaller bodied species. Our study builds upon previous studies that have shown species‐specificity in avian nest composition and supports the notion that birds using the same environment have distinct niches in relation to the materials placed in their nests. Niche partitioning due to interspecific competition could partially explain our findings, as certain materials are limited as resources, and searching for suitable nest materials is energetically costly. Additionally, other factors, such as partitioned nest sites, may have led to differential nest material use. We recommend further research to help elucidate underlying mechanisms of nest composition partitioning in birds and potentially other nest‐building taxa.

Use of anthropogenic material affects bird nest arthropod community structure: influence of urbanisation, and consequences for ectoparasites and fledging success

Urbanization Affects Nest Material Composition and Use of Anthropogenic Materials in Blue Tit Nests

Variation in the use of anthropogenic materials in tit nests: influence of human activities and pandemic restrictions

The extended avian urban phenotype: anthropogenic solid waste pollution, nest design, and fitness

Anthropogenic nest material use in a global sample of birds

Urbanisation and nest building in birds: a review of threats and opportunities

Why do some bird species incorporate more anthropogenic materials into their nests than others?

Quantifying the influence of urban biotic and abiotic environmental factors on great tit nestling physiology

Characterization of anthropogenic materials on yellow-legged gull (Larus michahellis) nests breeding in natural and urban sites along the coast of Portugal

Anthropogenic nesting substrates increase parental fitness in a Neotropical songbird, the pale‐breasted thrush Turdus leucomelas

Nest Composition Adjustments by Chinese Bulbuls Pycnonotus Sinensis in an Urbanized Landscape of Hangzhou (E China)

Effects of urban matrix on reproductive performance of Great Tit (Parus major) in urban woodlands

Differences in urban arthropod communities may not limit the nestling diet of a generalist songbird

Anthropogenic Nesting Materials and Reproductive Performance of Chinese Bulbuls (pycnonotus Sinensis) along the Urbanization Gradient in Hangzhou, China

An avian urban morphotype: how the city environment shapes great tit morphology at different life stages

Life amidst debris: urban waste management affects the utilization of anthropogenic waste materials in avian nest construction

Extra‐pair paternity in two passerine birds breeding in a gradient of urbanisation

Differential use of nest materials and niche space among avian species within a single ecological community

Environmental constraints can explain clutch size differences between urban and forest blue tits: Insights from an egg removal experiment

Interspecific variation in the relationship between clutch size, laying date and intensity of urbanization in four species of hole-nesting birds

Ambient anthropogenic noise but not light is associated with the ecophysiology of free-living songbird nestlings