Abstract:Urbanization represents a significant environmental change, and as urban land use continues to expand rapidly, understanding its impact on wildlife populations becomes critical for conservation management. However, the extent of these effects remains uncertain due to inconsistent evidence from studies focusing on single species, limited sites and short time frames. To address these gaps, we conducted a nationwide capture‐mark‐recapture study over an 8‐year period, examining the effects of urbanization on the survival and biometry of common bird species. Urbanization forms one of the most drastic alterations of the environment and poses a major threat to wildlife. The human–induced modifications of the landscape may affect individual's fitness resulting in population declines. Research on how urbanization affects fitness traits has shown mixed results. However, studies typically contrasted data from a single species from few urban and non‐urban sites collected over short timeframes. Examining multiple species across a broad urbanization gradient enables a more robust comparison and understanding of how different species are impacted by urbanization‐knowledge crucial for generating population predictions, which are essential for conservation management. Here, we use data from a nation‐wide citizen science project to examine variation in survival and relative body mass and size (wing length) of common passerine birds, collected along an urbanization gradient in the Netherlands over an 8‐year period. Urbanization was measured as the distance from the city's border and the proportion of impervious surface area. Although the overall association between urbanization and survival was slightly negative, there was support for lower survival closer to the city in three species (chiffchaff Phylloscopus collybita, European robin Erithacus rubecula, European greenfinch Chloris chloris) and higher survival closer to the city in two (great tit Parus major and house sparrow Passer domesticus) of the 11 species examined. The contrasting survival successes among species suggest that ongoing urbanization may lead to shifts in community structure and loss of biodiversity. Impacts of urbanization on relative mass and size also exhibited varying effects, albeit less pronounced, and these effects were not correlated with the effects on survival. This implies that body mass and size cannot be used as indicators for urban‐associated patterns of survival. Our results further imply that effective conservation management targeting bird communities should involve a range of diverse actions, as focusing on single measures is unlikely to simultaneously impact multiple species due to the variation in responses to urbanization.

Extra‐pair paternity in two passerine birds breeding in a gradient of urbanisation

Extra‐pair paternity enhances the reproductive fitness of urban Chinese blackbird

Genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species

Low level of extra-pair paternity in an urban population of blackbirds

An avian urban morphotype: how the city environment shapes great tit morphology at different life stages

Effects of urban matrix on reproductive performance of Great Tit (Parus major) in urban woodlands

The extended avian urban phenotype: anthropogenic solid waste pollution, nest design, and fitness

The city and forest bird flock together in a common garden: genetic and environmental effects drive urban phenotypic divergence

Quantifying the influence of urban biotic and abiotic environmental factors on great tit nestling physiology

[Extrapair Paternity in Parus Major].

Interspecific variation in the relationship between clutch size, laying date and intensity of urbanization in four species of hole-nesting birds

Changes to the gut microbiota of a wild juvenile passerine in a multidimensional urban mosaic

Hard life for sons in the nest? Sex-dependent offspring mortality in great tits in urban and forest areas

Extra-pair paternity in two sympatric Aegithalos tits: patterns and implications

Environmental constraints can explain clutch size differences between urban and forest blue tits: Insights from an egg removal experiment

Use of anthropogenic material affects bird nest arthropod community structure: influence of urbanisation, and consequences for ectoparasites and fledging success

High Level of Extra-Pair Paternity in the Socially Monogamous Marsh Tits (poecile Palustris)

Extra-Pair Paternity in Varied Tits Poecile Varius

A multidimensional framework to quantify the effects of urbanization on avian breeding fitness

Extra‐pair Paternity in Relation to Breeding Synchrony in Ground Tits: an Individual‐based Approach

A country‐wide examination of effects of urbanization on common birds