Abstract:Objective: In research, and particularly clinical trials, it is important to identify persons at high risk for developing Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), such as those with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). However, not all persons with this diagnosis have a high risk of AD as MCI can be broken down further into amnestic MCI (aMCI), who have a high risk specifically for AD, and non-amnestic MCI (naMCI), who are predominantly at risk for other dementias. People with aMCI largely differ from healthy controls and naMCI on memory tasks as it is the hallmark criteria for an amnestic diagnosis. Given the growing use of the NIH Toolbox Cognition battery in research trials, this project investigated which Toolbox Cognition measures best differentiated aMCI from naMCI and in comparison to persons with normal cognition. Participants and Methods: A retrospective data analysis was conducted investigating performance on NIH Toolbox Cognition tasks among 199 participants enrolled in the Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center. All participants were over age 50 (51-89 years, M=70.64) and had a diagnosis of aMCI (N=74), naMCI (N=24), or Normal Cognition (N=101). Potential demographic differences were investigated using chi-square and ANOVAs. Repeated measure general linear model was used to look at potential group differences in Toolbox Cognition performance, covarying for age which was statistically different in aMCI versus Normal participants. Linear regression was used to determine which cognitive abilities, as measured by the Uniform Data Set-3 (UDS3), might contribute to Toolbox differences noted in naMCI versus aMCI groups. Results: As expected, aMCI had lower Toolbox memory scores compared to naMCI (p=0.007) and Normals (p<0.001). Interestingly, naMCI had lower Oral Reading scores than both aMCI (p=0.008) and Normals (p<0.001). There were no other Toolbox performance differences between the MCI groups. 19.4% of the variance in Oral Reading scores was explained by performance on the following UDS3 measures: Benson delayed recall (inverse relationship) and backward digit span and phonemic fluency (positive relationship). Conclusions: In this study, Toolbox Picture Sequence Memory and Oral Reading scores differentiated aMCI and naMCI groups. While the difference in memory was expected, it was surprising that the naMCI group performed worse than the aMCI and normal groups on the Toolbox Oral Reading task, a task presumed to reflect Crystalized abilities resistive to cognitive decline. Results suggest that Oral Reading is primarily positively associated with working memory and executive tasks from the UDS3, but negatively associated with visual memory. It is possible that the Oral Reading subtest is sensitive to domains of deficit aside from memory that can best distinguish aMCI from naMCI. A better understanding of the underlying features in the Oral Reading task will assist in better characterizing deficit patterns seen in naMCI, making selection of aMCI participants more effective in clinical trials.

Correlates of recognition memory performance in amnestic mild cognitive impairment

Correlation of hippocampal volume and cognitive performances in patients with either mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease.

Effects of Anosognosia on Static and Dynamic Amplitudes of Low-Frequency Fluctuation in Mild Cognitive Impairment

Semantic interference deficits and the detection of mild Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment without dementia

Neural Correlates of Object Memory in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease

P1‐222: Auditory Verbal Learning Test is Superior to Rey‐osterrieth Complex Figure Memory for Predicting Progression from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease

Memory deficits for facial identity in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI)

Predictive value for cerebrospinal fluid Alzheimer's disease profile of different measures of verbal episodic memory in patients with MCI

Language Differences Among Individuals with Normal Cognition, Amnestic and Non-Amnestic MCI, and Alzheimer’s Disease

77 Differentiating Amnestic Versus Non-Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment Using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery

A Comparison Study of Mild Cognitive Impairment with 3 Memory Tests among Chinese Individuals.

When memory does not fail: Familiarity-based recognition in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Distinguishing the clinical and psychological characteristics between patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment and very mild Alzheimer disease

Auditory verbal learning disabilities in patients with mild cog impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease: A clinical study

The Distinct Roles Ofdifferent Memory Tests in Identifying Mild Cognitive Impairment

Multidimensional measures of person knowledge and spatial associative learning: can these be applied to the differentiation of Alzheimer's disease from frontotemporal and vascular dementia?

Comparison of the neuropsychological characteristics of two subtypes of mild cognitive impairment

Instrumental activities of daily living and mild cognitive impairment

Episodic and semantic memory in mild cognitive impairment

Validation of the Chinese Version of the Memory Binding Test for Distinguishing Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment from Cognitively Normal Elderly Individuals

Resting state functional connectivity abnormalities and delayed recall performance in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment