Abstract:The extant literature offers extensive support for the significant role played by institutions in financial markets, but implicit regulation and monitoring have yet to be examined. This study fills this void in the literature by employing unique Chinese datasets to explore the implicit regulation and penalties imposed by the Chinese government in regulating the initial public offering (IPO) market. Of particular interest are the economic consequences of underwriting IPO deals for client firms that violate regulatory rules in China’s capital market. We provide evidence to show that the associated underwriters’ reputations are impaired and their market share declines. We further explore whether such negative consequences result from a market disciplinary mechanism or a penalty imposed by the government. To analyze the possibility of a market disciplinary mechanism at work, we investigate (1) the market reaction to other client firms whose IPO deals were underwritten by underwriters associated with a violation at the time the violation was publicly disclosed and (2) the under-pricing of IPO deals undertaken by these underwriters after such disclosure. To analyze whether the government imposes an implicit penalty, we examine the application processing time for future IPO deals underwritten by the associated underwriters and find it to be significantly longer than for IPO deals underwritten by other underwriters. Overall, there is little evidence to suggest that the market penalizes underwriters for the rule-violating behavior of their client firms in China. Instead, the Chinese government implicitly penalizes them by imposing more stringent criteria on and lengthening the processing time of the IPO deals they subsequently underwrite.

The oversight role of regulators: evidence from SEC comment letters in the IPO process

IPO Offer Price Regulation, Financial Reporting Quality, and IPO Overpricing

Monitoring or Colluding: the Role of Venture Capital Investors in the IPO Process

Do Private Equity Investors Conspire with Ultimate Owners in the IPO Process?

Do the outstanding comments of regulatory reviewers for approved IPOs serve as a valuation signal for investors?

Bayesian piecewise stochastic frontier model to estimate initial public offering pricing efficiency under issuance policy reforms

IPO Underpricing and Limited Attention: Theory and Evidence

Limited Attention, Legalized Bribery and the Initial Public Offering Process

IPO pricing deregulation and corporate governance: Theory and evidence from Chinese public firms

The Impacts of Registration Regime Implementation on IPO Pricing Efficiency

The Impact of the Tone of a Prospectus on IPO Underpricing: Evidence from China

The Role of External Regulators in Mergers and Acquisitions: Evidence from SEC Comment Letters

Underwriters' Regional Oligopoly and IPO Pricing:Empirical Evidence from A-share Listed Companies in China

Underwriter reputation and IPO underpricing: The role of institutional investors in the Chinese growth enterprise market

IPO policy and IPO underpricing: Evidence from the registration-based IPO reform in China

Securities Regulation and Implicit Penalties

The long-run performance of initial public offerings and its determinants: the case of China

The underpricing and long-term performance of Chinese IPOs listed on the Hong Kong exchange

The Impact of Regulation Regime Changes on ChiNext IPOs: Effects of 2013 and 2020 Reforms on Pricing and Overreaction

IPO Pricing Efficiency and Ownership Structure: Evidence from China