Abstract:Purpose: To assess the effect of implant abutment material and soft tissue thickness on the peri-implant soft tissue color using spectrophotometry and to evaluate gingival esthetics and patient satisfaction with three different abutments. Materials and methods: Twenty-five patients with a missing maxillary tooth in the esthetic area received an endosseous implant using a two-stage protocol. Gray titanium, pink anodized titanium, and hybrid zirconia custom abutments were fabricated for each participant and inserted for one week with a cross-over design in a randomized manner. Color measurements were made using a spectrophotometer comparing midfacial peri-implant soft tissue and marginal gingiva of the contralateral tooth. CIE Lab color scale was used following the formula: ΔE = [(∆L)2 + (∆a)2 + (∆b)2 ]½ . PES scores were recorded, and patient satisfaction questionnaires were completed at each abutment change visit and at 1-year follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed using Friedman's test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction as well as the Mann-Whitney U test (α = 0.05). Results: Abutment material type significantly affected the ΔΕ values of the peri-implant mucosa when compared to the contralateral teeth. At baseline, the highest ΔΕ means ± standard deviation (SD) values were obtained with gray titanium (11.25 ± 2.98), followed by pink anodized titanium (9.90 ± 2.51), and zirconia abutments (6.46 ± 1.43). Differences were statistically significant irrespective of soft tissue thickness. The highest PES values were obtained with zirconia abutments (10.88 ± 0.88), followed by pink anodized titanium (10.12 ± 1.13) and the lowest with gray titanium (9.68 ± 1.41). PES differences were significant only for the thin soft tissue group. Regarding patient satisfaction, VAS scores for the pink anodized and zirconia hybrid abutment groups were higher than the gray titanium group for each question. Conclusion: The color difference between soft tissues around teeth and implants was significant in all groups regardless of tissue thickness. The hybrid zirconia abutments resulted in the least color difference, followed by pink anodized and gray titanium. Significantly different PES values were recorded only for the thin tissue group. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction between zirconia and pink anodized abutments at the 1-year follow up. Pink anodized abutments represent a good esthetic alternative to zirconia hybrid abutments especially in mechanically challenging situations.

A prospective clinical trial to assess the optical efficacy of pink neck implants and pink abutments on soft tissue esthetics

An Esthetic Evaluation of Different Abutment Materials in the Anterior Maxilla: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Using a Crossover Design

Influence of anodized titanium abutments on the esthetics of the peri-implant soft tissue: A clinical study

Clinical Effect of Nobel Biocare Angulated Screw Channel Crown Compared with Cement Crown in the Aesthetic Area: A Retrospective Cohort Study with a Mean 32 Months Follow-Up (range 12 to 70 Months).

Changes in the esthetic, physical, and biological properties of a titanium alloy abutment treated by anodic oxidation

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Influence of Abutment Material on Peri-implant Soft Tissue Color Measured Using Spectrophotometry

Immediately versus early placed bone‐level‐tapered implants supporting all‐ceramic crowns on titanium base abutments: 1‐year radiographic and pink esthetic outcomes of a multicenter pilot RCT

Comparison of the effect of zirconia and titanium abutments on peri-implant hard and soft tissues

Can patients detect peri‑implant mucosal inflammation? Results from a multicentre randomized trial

[Comparison of clinical esthetic effects of two abutments of maxillary anterior dental implants with single crown]

INFLUENCE OF ABUTMENT MATERIAL, CEMENT THICKNESS, AND CROWN TYPE ON THE FINAL COLOR OF IMPLANT-SUPPORTED RESTORATIONS

[Esthetic evaluation of conventional and socket shield technique immediate implant restoration].

Variations in Soft and Hard Tissues following Immediate Implant Placement versus Delayed Implant Placement following Socket Preservation in the Maxillary Esthetic Region: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Effect of different prosthetic abutments on peri-implant soft tissue. A randomized controlled clinical trial

Clinical and immunological evaluation of peri-implant tissues around ultra-polished and conventionally-polished zirconia abutments. A 1-year follow-up randomized clinical trial

In vitro effect of anodization on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion to titanium abutments

The importance of red aesthetics in dental implants: a systematic review

Comparison of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Around Zirconia and Titanium Abutments in the Aesthetic Zone: A Narrative Review

Validation of the pink esthetic score/white esthetic score at single tooth‐supported prostheses in the esthetic zone: A randomized clinical trial

Esthetic and Physical Changes of Innovative Titanium Surface Properties Obtained with Laser Technology

Timing of Immediate, Early, and Delayed Implant Placement in the Aesthetic Zone and Their Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis