[Surgical Repair of the Tunica Albuginea for Penis Fracture: Selection of Incision].
Yuan-Shen Mao,Bao Hua,Wei-Xin Pan,Wen-Feng Li,Yu-Fei Gu,Hai-Jun Yao,Zhi-Kang Cai,Zhong Wang,Chao Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13263/j.cnki.nja.2018.04.008
2018-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To investigate the diagnosis and management of penile fracture.METHODS:From June 1993 to May 2017, 46 cases of penile fracture were treated in our hospital, averaging 33.5 (25－42) years of age and 3.45 (1－10) hours in duration, of which 41 occurred during sexual intercourse, 4 during masturbation and 1 during prone sleeping, 4 with hematuria, but none with dysuria or urethral bleeding. Hematoma was confined to the penis. Emergency surgical repair was performed for all the patients, 45 under spinal anesthesia and 1 under local anesthesia, 16 by coronal proximal circular incision and the other 30 by local longitudinal incision according to the rupture location on ultrasonogram. The tunica albuginea ruptures averaged 1.31 (0.5－2.5) cm in length, which were sutured in the "8" pattern for 6 cases and with the 3－0 absorbable thread for 18 cases. The skin graft or negative pressure drainage tube was routinely placed, catheters indwelt, and gauze used for early pressure dressing. In the recent few years, elastic bandages were employed for 3－5 days of pressure dressing and antibiotics administered to prevent infection. The stitches and catheter were removed at 7 days after surgery.RESULTS:Short-term postoperative foreskin edema occurred in 14 of the 16 cases of circular degloving incision, but no postoperative complications were observed in any of the cases of local incision. Twenty-eight of the patients completed a long-term follow-up of 49.4 (10－125) months, which revealed good erectile function, painless erection, and satisfactory sexual intercourse.CONCLUSIONS:For most penile fractures, local longitudinal incision is sufficient for successful repair of the tunica albuginea, with mild injury, no influence on the blood supply or lymph reflux, and a low rate complications. It therefore is obviously advantageous over circular degloving incision except when the cavernous body of urethra is to be explored, which necessitates circular degloving incision below the coronal groove.