Abstract:The purpose of this study is to present a reasonable control plan for the prosecution discretion of prosecutors who protect the safety of the social system as a representative of the public interest, Examining the institutional background of the prosecution's non-indictment. After processing and reviewing cases of non-prosecution dispositions in accusation cases, the direction of control of non-indictment was sought. Prosecutors may institute prosecution or non-indictment by investigating cases in which complaints and accusations are forwarded by judicial police officers or cases in which direct complaints and accusations are prescribed by Acts and subordinate statutes. The control system for non-indictment by prosecutors is divided into internal control and external control. For dissatisfaction with the non-indictment of the accusation case, internal control measures are being prepared through ‘notice of the purpose and reason for the non-indictment’ and ‘appeal to the prosecution (reappeal)’. In this study, the following matters were reviewed through the progress of cases of non-indictment and review of legal principles. For the first time, While acknowledging the fact of the actor's act, we discussed the wrong interpretation of the law that may not admit the establishment of a crime by changing the interpretation of the law. Also, In the discretionary judgment of suspension of indictment, additional factors for judgment on the possibility of blame related to the responsibility derived from the legal status of actors were examined. And, Once the prosecution appeal (reappeal) procedure, which is an internal control method for non-indictment recognized by the accuser, is completed, there is no longer any means of dissatisfaction in criminal procedures. The direction of control sought through the review of non-indictment cases is as follows. First, the target cases should be expanded so that all accusation cases can be Application for Adjudication. Second, the standard and scope of the prosecutor's prosecution should be stipulated at the level of the law and order, and notified to the general public. Third, public procedures should be established so that the general public can read and copy the reason for non-indictment, which is a quasi-judicial judgment at the end of the investigation process. This study lacks a discussion in connection with the appeal limit system for the judicial police officer's non-transfer decision in accusation cases. therefore. It should be supplemented from a macroscopic point of view of criminal justice procedures through future research.

The Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015 and the Crime Suspect's Right of Silence: A Clog in the Wheels of Justice?

The Right to Silence Helps the Innocent: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Fifth Amendment Privilege

Keep silence for yourself: The protection of the right to silence in the Italian criminal justice system

The Suspect’s Rights in the Investigation Process: A Case Study at the South Sulawesi Regional Police

"You have the right to remain silent, so why are you talking?" : interrogation rights, decision making, and the availability heuristic

Plea bargaining as a human rights question

Presumption of Innocence Against Criminal Offenders in the Police: A Critical Study

A Comparative Study on the Obstruction of Justice of U.S.-Korea

"It Looks Like a Spell...": Acceptance of Crime Commission as Power Strategy in Confessional Statements in Police–Suspect Interactions in Ibadan, Southwestern Nigeria

' Are We Sure That He Knew That You Don't Want to Have Sex?': Discursive Constructions of the Suspect in Police Interviews with Rape Complainants

The Urgence Of The Control Mechanism Of Authority The Prosecutor General In Waiting The Case For Public Interest (Seponeering)

Truth and procedural fairness in Chinese criminal procedure law

A study on the regulation of Non-indictment in accusation case: Focusing on the review of cases

A Study on the Necessity of Abolition of Exclusive Accusation Rights in Criminal Practice - Focusing on Tax offense case -

Problematic Issues of Protection of Rights and Legitimate Interests of Victims of Crime

Evidential Admissibility of Suspect-Interrogation Protocol, Statement of Accomplice is recorded, Drawn by Judicial Police Officer

Summary procedure and presumption of innocence: implications in the Ecuadorian judicial system through a SWOT analysis

The Implications of Criminal Responsibility on Law Enforcement Officers in Cameroon: Sanctions and Enforcement Mechanisms

The relationship of advocate investigation and evidence in criminal proceedings

Voice, neutrality and respect: Use of Victim Support services, procedural fairness and confidence in the criminal justice system

THE RIGHT TO TRIAL WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME AND THE CHALLENGES OF RESPECTING IT IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE