Abstract:Unclear status of the suspect in the investigation stage for the suspect even though it is not yet legally available that he is found guilty: What is the cause of the unclear status of the suspect at the investigation stage (case study of extension of the Cooperation Agreement for the Management and Operation of the Jakarta International (JICT) Terminal? or what are the legal consequence and what actions must be taken for the pending case at the investigation stage (adjudication) the purpose of the study is to find out the cause of the unclear status of the suspect at investigation stage and to find out and clary the legal consequences and actions to be taken on cases that are hanging at investigation stage (adjudication) by someone who has unclear suspect status on himself. The legal research methodology is a dogmatic study or doctrinal research. The cause of the unclear status of the suspect in the extension of the JICT Operation and Management Cooperation Agreement, the value of state losses as a result of the investigation reported by BPK, 1b. Remain in doubt. The Attorney General does not believe that there is a state loss in the JICT, Management Contract Extension All Procedure according to the rules have been carried out by suspect. The legal consequences for unclear status of the suspect are very detrimental to the suspect and injure the basic right of citizens to legal certainty and justice, 3b. The abuse of authority of the apparatus results in human right violations.3c. The legal action to be taken by the suspect is. Protection may be requested through a pre-trial which guarantees the rights of the suspect in accordance with his dignity as a human being. The termination of the investigation of the suspect may refer to the provisions of article 76 of the regulation of the National Police Chief No. 14 of 2012 concerning the management of criminal cases. Ketidakjelasan status tersangka dalam tahap penyidikan (pra ajudikasi), membawa konsekuensi hukum tersendiri bagi tersangka walaupun secara yuridis belum ada kepastian dinyatakan bersalah: Apakah penyebab ketidakjelasan status tersangka pada tahap penyidikan (studi kasus Perpanjangan Perjanjian Kerjasama Pengelolaan dan Pengoperasian Jakarta International Center Terminal (JICT)? atau Apakah akibat hukum dan tindakan apa yang harus dilakukan atas perkara yang menggantung di tahap penyidikan (ajudikasi).Tujuan penelitian adalah, untuk mengetahui penyebab ketidakjelasan status tersangka dan untuk mengetahui dan memperjelas akibat hukum dan tindakan yang harus dilakukan atas perkara yang menggantung di tahap penyidikan (ajudikasi). Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum dengan studi dogmatik atau doctrinal research. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyebab ketidakjelasan status tersangka pada kasus Perpanjangan Perjanjian Kerjasama Pengelolaan dan Pengoperasian JICT, masih diragukan nilai kerugian negara hasil investigatif yang dilaporkan oleh BPK. Jaksa Agung tidak meyakini adanya kerugian negara dalam perpanjangan kontrak pengelolaan JICT. Semua prosedur sesuai aturan telah dilakukan oleh tersangka. Akibat hukum atas ketidakjelasan status tersangka sangat merugikan tersangka dan mencederai hak dasar warga negara untuk kepastian hukum dan keadilan. Atas penyalahgunaan wewenang aparat tersebut, berakibat pelanggaran hak asasi manusia (HAM). Tindakan hukum yang harus dilakukan oleh tersangka adalah dapat dimintakan perlindungan melalui pranata pra peradilan yang akan menjamin hak-hak tersangka sesuai dengan harkat dan martabatnya sebagai manusia atas penghentian penyidikan, tersangka dapat mengacu pada aturan Ketentuan Pasal 76 Peraturan Kapolri No. 14 Tahun 2012 tentang Manajemen Perkara Pidana.

The Suspect’s Rights in the Investigation Process: A Case Study at the South Sulawesi Regional Police

LEGAL PROTECTION OF THE SUSPECTS TO NOT EXPERIENCE VIOLENCE IN INVESTIGATION PROCESS

Legal Reconstruction of Suspect Investigation Based on Pancasila Justice Values

Legal Protection of the Rights of Suspects in Criminal Case Investigation Process in Human Rights Perspective

Presumption of Innocence Against Criminal Offenders in the Police: A Critical Study

Analysis of Reporting and Investigation Problems in Criminal Procedure

Reconstruction of Investigation Regulations in Absentia Criminal Corruption Cases in Indonesia Based on Justice Values

Protection of Human Rights in the Investigation Process Criminal Offenses in Indonesia

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO OBTAIN LEGAL ASSISTANCE FOR POOR CITIZENS AT THE INVESTIGATION STAGE

Pretrial Determination of Suspects in Corruption Cases: A Critical Analysis of Judge Sarpin Rizaldi's Decision and Its Implications for Combating Corruption in Indonesia

The Role of Witness and Victim Protection Agency for Imekko Tribe in Criminal Justice System in Sorong

ASAS PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE DALAM PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA SEBAGAI LANDASAN KEADILAN

PELAKSANAAN PEMBERIAN BANTUAN HUKUM PADA TINGKAT PENYIDIKAN BERDASARKAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA (KUHAP) DI WILAYAH HUKUM POLRES BUKITTINGGI

Mechanism for Handling of Criminal Action Prohibiting the Use of Land Without Permission

Advancing Justice: Embracing a Progressive Legal Framework for Case Resolution in Central Java Police Criminal Investigation (A Case Study at Polda Ditreskrimsus)

Implementation of the principle of presumption of innocence of suspects in investigations, pre-trial and trial examinations

Notary and legal arrangement of criminal law: Legal protection for notaries facing criminal cases

The Unclear Status of The Suspect in the Investigation Stage: Case Study of The Extension of The Cooperation Agreement on The Management and Operation of The Jakarta International Container Terminal

Analysis Of The Implementation Of The Non-Conviction-Based Concept In The Practice Of Asset Recovery Of Money Laundering Criminal Act In Indonesia From The Perspective Of Presumption Of Innocence

The Urgence Of The Control Mechanism Of Authority The Prosecutor General In Waiting The Case For Public Interest (Seponeering)

Protection of Human Rights Against Criminal Offenders in Detention Process