Abstract:OBJECTIVE To examine and suggest improvements for deficiencies occurring in the specimen identification and accessioning process in the surgical pathology laboratory. DESIGN Using the College of American Pathologists' and the Joint Commission for Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations' requirements as the standard, each laboratory was asked to prospectively document deficiencies in specimen identification and accessioning for 4 months, or until a maximum of 4000 cases or 400 deficiencies were accrued. PARTICIPANTS Four hundred seventeen laboratories in the College of American Pathologists' voluntary quality improvement program, Q-Probes, participated in this study. RESULTS Identification and accessioning deficiencies were found in 60 042 (6%) out of a total 1 004 115 cases accessioned (median deficiency rate of 3.4%). Errors related to specimen identification accounted for 9.6% of these deficiencies, discrepant or missing information items were present in 77%, and 3.6% involved specimen handling. The most common deficiency was "no clinical history or diagnosis present on the requisition slip," which represented 40% of all deficiencies. Deficiencies were most often detected by the person assigned to accessioning duties or by histology personnel. In 66% of cases, no action was taken to remedy the deficiency, but this varied dramatically according to the specific type of deficiency. An action was taken to remedy deficiencies in 69% of cases involving specimen identification errors, in 58% of specimen handling errors, and in 27% of cases with discrepant or missing information. Peer group stratifiers were associated with a lower deficiency rate. Laboratories with lower numbers (<15 000) of accessioned cases and laboratories with a formal written plan for the detection of errors in accessioning and specimen identification reported lower rates of deficiencies. Factors that correlated with a higher rate of deficiencies included submitting the specimen container and requisition slip in a unique secondary container (P<.005) and labeling the specimen container with only a patient's name or unique patient identification number (as opposed to both identifiers). CONCLUSIONS The majority of deficiencies occurring in surgical pathology specimen identification and accessioning are related to missing or inaccurate clinical information. Deficiencies are detected in multiple locations, including areas not typically thought of as quality check points, such as transcription. A variable amount of effort occurs to rectify deficiencies; this effort is largely dependent on the type of deficiency involved. Finally, laboratories with a formal error detection plan had fewer deficiencies.

Surgical specimen handover from the operating theatre to laboratory-Can we improve patient safety by learning from aviation and other high-risk organisations?

Surgical specimen handover from operation theater to laboratory: A survey

From the Operating Theater to the Pathology Laboratory: Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis of the Biological Samples Transfer

Improved patient safety with a simplified operating room to pediatric intensive care unit handover tool (PATHQS)

Research progress on surgical specimen standardized management

Implementing a pre-operative checklist to increase patient safety: a 1-year follow-up of personnel attitudes

Obstacles to using the safe surgery checklist: Perspectives of first-line personnel

Clinical handover: An audit from Australia

Surgical Safety Checklist,the Last Line for Safe Surgery

[Implementation of the Perioperative WHO Safety Checklist at a Maximum Care Hospital - A Retrospective Analysis]

Application of Information Link Control in Surgical Specimen Near-Miss Events in a South China Hospital: Nonrandomized Controlled Study

A ‘paperless’ wall-mounted surgical safety checklist with migrated leadership can improve compliance and team engagement

Surgical pathology specimen identification and accessioning: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 1 004 115 cases from 417 institutions.

iSoBAR — a concept and handover checklist: the National Clinical Handover Initiative

Improving cardiac operating room to intensive care unit handover using a standardised handover process

Lost, Mislabeled, and Unsuitable Surgical Pathology Specimens

SP3.11 - Beyond the microscope – Unravelling the Significance of Colorectal Cancer Histopathology Request Forms

Creating a high-performance surgical safety checklist: A multimodal evaluation plan to reinvigorate the checklist

Handoff checklists improve the reliability of patient handoffs in the operating room and postanesthesia care unit

13: AN IMPROVEMENT ON THE SURGICAL SAFETY CHECKLIST ACCORDING TO PRACTICE-BASED EVIDENCE

The transition of patient care: Exploring the outcomes of prehospital to hospital patient handover practices and healthcare provider education