Abstract:OBJECTIVE To examine and suggest improvements for deficiencies occurring in the specimen identification and accessioning process in the surgical pathology laboratory. DESIGN Using the College of American Pathologists' and the Joint Commission for Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations' requirements as the standard, each laboratory was asked to prospectively document deficiencies in specimen identification and accessioning for 4 months, or until a maximum of 4000 cases or 400 deficiencies were accrued. PARTICIPANTS Four hundred seventeen laboratories in the College of American Pathologists' voluntary quality improvement program, Q-Probes, participated in this study. RESULTS Identification and accessioning deficiencies were found in 60 042 (6%) out of a total 1 004 115 cases accessioned (median deficiency rate of 3.4%). Errors related to specimen identification accounted for 9.6% of these deficiencies, discrepant or missing information items were present in 77%, and 3.6% involved specimen handling. The most common deficiency was "no clinical history or diagnosis present on the requisition slip," which represented 40% of all deficiencies. Deficiencies were most often detected by the person assigned to accessioning duties or by histology personnel. In 66% of cases, no action was taken to remedy the deficiency, but this varied dramatically according to the specific type of deficiency. An action was taken to remedy deficiencies in 69% of cases involving specimen identification errors, in 58% of specimen handling errors, and in 27% of cases with discrepant or missing information. Peer group stratifiers were associated with a lower deficiency rate. Laboratories with lower numbers (<15 000) of accessioned cases and laboratories with a formal written plan for the detection of errors in accessioning and specimen identification reported lower rates of deficiencies. Factors that correlated with a higher rate of deficiencies included submitting the specimen container and requisition slip in a unique secondary container (P<.005) and labeling the specimen container with only a patient's name or unique patient identification number (as opposed to both identifiers). CONCLUSIONS The majority of deficiencies occurring in surgical pathology specimen identification and accessioning are related to missing or inaccurate clinical information. Deficiencies are detected in multiple locations, including areas not typically thought of as quality check points, such as transcription. A variable amount of effort occurs to rectify deficiencies; this effort is largely dependent on the type of deficiency involved. Finally, laboratories with a formal error detection plan had fewer deficiencies.

SP3.11 - Beyond the microscope – Unravelling the Significance of Colorectal Cancer Histopathology Request Forms

Improving Interdisciplinary Communication and Pathology Reporting for Head and Neck Cancer Resections: 3D Visualizations and Margin Reconciliation

Timely Review and Communication of Histopathology Reports Following Appendicectomy: Insights from a Two-Cycle Clinical Audit

Closing the Gap: A Critical Examination of Adherence, Inconsistency, and Improvements in Colonoscopy Reporting Practices

Surgical specimen handover from the operating theatre to laboratory-Can we improve patient safety by learning from aviation and other high-risk organisations?

Surgical pathology specimen identification and accessioning: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 1 004 115 cases from 417 institutions.

The utility of synoptic operation reports in colorectal surgery: a systematic review

Variation in cystectomy pathology reporting practice-results from an international survey of 212 pathologists

Pathology requesting in a regional Australian Emergency Department; an observational study comparing current practice with college guidelines

Perceived Provision of Perioperative Information and Care by Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study

Current gross examination and reporting patterns of post–neoadjuvant chemotherapy cystectomy specimens: Is it time for a standardized approach?

Update on the surgical pathology standards on rectal cancer diagnosis, staging and quality assessment of surgery

Histopathological Assessment of the Endoscopic Resection Specimen

Margin status of Basal Cell Carcinoma: What can be done better?

Surgical specimen handover from operation theater to laboratory: A survey

Challenges and clinical relevance of modern breast pathology reporting – your questions answered

The role of multidisciplinary team meeting histopathology review and its impact on revised reports: Analysis of a national quality improvement program

How many polyps need to be histologically assessed when multiple polyps are submitted for the Bowel Cancer Screening Program?

IMPACT organizational survey highlighting provision of services for patients with locally advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer across Great Britain and Ireland

Rate of Diagnostic Change in Surgical Pathology Reports after Mandatory Intradepartmental Peer Review in a Tertiary Hospital in the Philippines: A Retrospective Study

Assessment of Oncology Medical Records as per NABH Standards